DifScal: A tool for analyzing difference ratings on an ordinal category scale

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 10-20

  Boschman, Martin C ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMETRY; RESEARCH; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMANS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMETRICS; RESEARCH; SOFTWARE; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 0035259232     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195343     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. AGRESTI, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
2. ANDERSON, N. H. (1970). Functional measurement and psychological judgment. Psychological Review, 77, 153-170.
3. BELAÏD, N. (1999). Perceptual linearization of soft-copy displays for achromatic images. Doctoral thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology.
4. BOSCHMAN, M. C. (2000). ThurCatD: A tool for analyzing ratings on an ordinal category scale. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 379-388.
5. BOSCHMAN, M. C., & ROUFS, J. A. J. (1997). Text quality metrics for visual display units: II. An experimental survey. Displays, 18, 45-64.
6. DE RIDDER, H., & MAJOOR, G. M. M. (1990). Numerical category scaling: An efficient method for assessing digital image coding impairments. In J. P. Allebach & B. E. Rogowitz (Eds.), Human vision and electronic imaging: Models, methods and applications (Proceedings of the SPIE, Vol. 1249, pp. 65-77). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
7. FREEMAN, M. F., & TUKEY, J. W. (1950). Transformations related to the angular and the square root. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 21, 607-611.
8. GULLIKSEN, H. (1956). A least squares solution for paired comparisons with incomplete data. Psychometrika, 21, 125-134.
9. KRUSKAL, J. B. (1964). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method. Psychometrika, 29, 115-129.
10. MARTENS, J.-B., & MAJOOR, G. M. M. (1989). The perceptual relevance of scale-space image coding. Signal Processing, 17, 353-364.
11. MARTENS, J.-B., & MEESTERS, L. M. J. (1998). Image dissimilarity. Signal Processing, 70, 155-176.
12. MEESTERS, L. M. J., & MARTENS, J.-B. (1999). Blockiness in JPEG-coded images. In B. E. Rogowitz & T. N. Pappas (Eds.), Human vision and electronic imaging IV (Proceedings of the SPIE, Vol. 3644, pp. 245-257). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
13. MOSTELLER, F. (1951a). Remarks on the method of paired comparisons: I. The least squares solution assuming equal standard deviations and equal correlations. Psychometrika, 16, 3-11.
14. MOSTELLER, F. (1951b). Remarks on the method of paired comparisons: III. A test of significance for paired comparisons when equal standard deviations and equal correlations are assumed. Psychometrika, 16, 207-218.
15. THURSTONE, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273-286.
16. TORGERSON, W. S. (1958). Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley.
17. VAN TREES, H. L. (1968). Detection, estimation and modulation theory: Part I. Detection and linear modulation theory. New York: Wiley.
18. WILKS, S. S.(1938). The large sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 9, 60-62.