Reliability of rotary prism fusional vergence ranges

Optometry

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 117-122

  Penisten, Douglas K ^a   Hofstetter, Henry W ^b   Goss, David A ^b  

^a NORTHEASTERN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Binocular vision; Clinical testing; Vergence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STRABISMUS; VISION TEST;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENSES; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STRABISMUS; VISION TESTS; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 0035258506     PISSN: 15291839     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Daum KM. Vergence amplitude. In: Eskridge JB, Amos JF, Bartlett JD, eds. Clinical procedures in optometry. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1991:91-8.
2. Grosvenor T. Primary care optometry: anomalies of refraction and binocular vision, 3rd ed. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1996:314-8.
3. Saladin JJ. Phorometry and stereopsis. In: Benjamin WJ, ed. Borish's clinical refraction. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1998:724-73.
4. Haines HF. Normal values of visual functions and their application in case analysis. Part IV. The analysis of findings and determination of normals. AmJ Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1941;18:58-73.
5. Haines HF. Normal values of visual functions and their application in case analysis. Part V Presenting a table of normal values for visual functions. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1941;18:112-6.
6. Shepard CF. The most probable "expecteds." Optom Weekly 1941;32:538-41.
7. Morgan MW. Analysis of clinical data. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1944;21:477-91.
8. Saladin JJ, Sheedy JE. Population study of fixation disparity, heterophoria, and vergence. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1978;55:744-50.
9. Jackson TW, Goss DA. Variation and correlation of standard clinical phoropter tests of phorias, vergence ranges, and relative accommodation. J AM OPTOM ASSOC 1991;62:540-7.
10. Rosenfield M, Ciuffreda KJ, Ong E, et al. Vergence adaptation and the order of clinical vergence range testing. Optom Vis Sci 1995;72:219-23.
11. Goss DA. Effect of test sequence on fusional vergence ranges. N Engl J Optom 1995;47:39-42.
12. Brozek J, Simonson E, Bushard WJ, et al. Effects of practice and the consistency of repeated measurements of accommodation and vergence. Am J Ophthalmol 1948; 31:191-8.
13. Wesson MD, Amos JF. Norms for hand-held rotary prism vergences. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985;62:88-94.
14. Borish IM. Clinical refraction, 3rd ed. Chicago: Professional Press, 1970:827-8.
15. Carlson NB, Kurtz D, Heath DA. Clinical procedures for ocular examination, 2nd ed. Stamford, Conn.: Appleton & Lange, 1996:165, 80.
16. Alpern M. The after effect of lateral duction testing on subsequent phoria measurements. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1946;23:442-7.
17. Carter DB. Fixation disparity and heterophoria following prolonged wearing of prisms. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1965;42:141-52.
18. Schor CM. Fixation disparity and vergence adaptation. In: Schor CM, Ciuffreda KJ, eds. Vergence eye movements: basic and clinical aspects. Boston: Butterworths, 1983:465-516.
19. Sethi B. Vergence adaptation: a review. Doc Ophthalmol 1986;63:247-63.
20. Stephens GL, Jones R. Horizontal fusional maplitudes after adaptation to prism. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1990;10:25-8.
21. Henson DB, North R. Adaptation to prism-induced heterophoria. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1980;57:129-37.
22. Dixon WJ, Massey FJ Jr. Introduction to statistical analysis, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969:138.
23. Wesson MD, Masin LC, Boyles ST. Objective testing of vergence ranges. J AM OPTOM ASSOC 1995;66:338-42.
24. Sheedy JE, Saladin JJ. Phoria, vergence, and fixation disparity in oculomotor problems. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1977;54:474-8.
25. Sheedy JE, Saladin JJ. Association of symptoms with measures of oculomotor deficiencies. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1978;55:670-6.
26. Dalziel CC. Effect of vision training on patients who fail Sheardís criterion. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1981;58:21-3.
27. Robertson KM. Application of Percivalís criterion in correcting insignificant hyperopia in a pre-presbyope. Can J Optom 1984;46:39-40.