Performance funding programs: Assessing their stability

Research in Higher Education

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 51-70

  Burke, Joseph C ^a   Modarresi, Shahpar ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b Prince George's County Public Schools   (United States)

Author keywords

Budgeting; Indicators; Performance funding

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035256074     PISSN: 03610365     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1018764511093     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Afifi, A. A., and Clark, V. (1990). Computer-Aided Multivariate Analysis. New York: Van Nostrand.
2. Albright, Brenda, N. (1998). The Transition from Business as Usual to Funding for Results: State Efforts to Integrate Performance Measures in the Higher Education Budgetary Process. Denver, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers.
3. Borden, Victor M., and Banta, Trudy, W. (1994). Using performance indicators to guide strategic decision making. New Directions in Institutional Research, No. 82. Summer. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Burke, J. C. (1997). Performance Funding Indicators: Concerns, Values, and Models for Two- and Four-Year Colleges and Universities. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute.
5. Burke, J. C. et al. (2000). Performance Funding and Budgeting: An Emergency Merger: The Fourth Annual Survey. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute.
6. Burke, J. C., and Modarresi, S. (1999). To Keep or Not to Keep Performance Funding: Signals from Stakeholders. The Journal of Higher Education July/August, 71(4): 832-853.
7. Burke, J. C., and Serban, A. M. (1997). Performance Funding and Budgeting for Public Higher Education: Current Status and Future Prospects. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute.
8. Burke, J. C., and Serban, A. M. (1998a). Current Status and Future Prospects of Performance Funding and Performance Budgeting for Public Higher Education: The Second Survey. Albany, New York: Rockefeller Institute.
9. Burke, J. C., and Serban, A. M. (1998b). Performance funding for public higher education: Fad or trend? New Directions in Institutional Research, No. 97. Spring. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Caruthers, J. K., and Layzell, Daniel (1995, November 2). Performance Funding at the State Level: Trends and Prospects. Paper presented to the 1995 Annual Meeting for the Study of Higher Education, Orlando, FL.
11. Christal, Melodie E. (1998). State Survey on Performance Measures: 1996-97. Denver, CO: State Higher Education Executive Officers.
12. Cruze-Castillo, J. G. S., Ganeshanandam, B. R., Mackay, G. S., Lawes, and Woolley, D. J. (1994). Application of canonical discriminant analysis in horticultural research. HortScience 29(3): 1115-1119.
13. Gaither, Gerald, Nedwek, Brian, and Neal, John (1994). Measuring up: The promises and pitfalls of performance indicators in higher education. ASHE/Eric Higher Education Report, no. 5. Washington, DC: George Washington University Press.
14. Marshall, C., Mitchell, D., and Wirt, F. (1989). Culture and Education Policy in the American States. New York: The Faber Press.
15. Mazmanian, Daniel A., and Sabatier, Paul A. (1989). Implementation and Public Policy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
16. Morrison, Malcolm (1995). Quality assurance in higher education: A case study of Tennessee's performance funding program with learning points for the development of teaching quality assessment in UK higher education. (Unpublished Report).
17. Richardson, R. C. (1994). Effectiveness in undergraduate education: An analysis of state quality indicators. In S. S. Ruppert (ed.), Charting Higher Education Accountability: A Source Book on State-Level Performance Indicators. Denver: Education Commission of the States.
18. Stein, Robert B, (1996). Performance reporting/funding programs: Missouri's efforts to integrate state and campus strategic planning. In Gerald Gaither (ed.), Performance Indicators in Higher Education: What Works, What Doesn't, and What's Next, pp. 36-58. Proceedings from the pre-conference symposium. College Station: Texas A & M System.