Discrimination of wide-field images as a test of a peripheral-vision model

Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 294-301

  Peli, Eli ^a   Geri, George A ^b  

^a SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b L3 Communications Corp   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIFFRACTION GRATINGS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; SIMULATORS;

IMAGE DISCRIMINATION;

VISION;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0035256001     PISSN: 10847529     EISSN: 15208532     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.18.000294     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. A. P. Ginsburg, “Visual information processing based on spatial filters constrained by biological data,” Ph.D. dissertation (Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK, 1978).
2. B. L. Lundh, G. Derefeldt, S. Nyberg, and G. Lennerstrand, “Picture simulation of contrast sensitivity in organic and functional amblyopia,” Acta Ophthalmol. (KbH) 59, 774-783 (1981).
3. D. Pelli, “What is low vision?” Videotape, Institute for Sensory Research, Syracuse University, Syracuse, N.Y. (1990).
4. L. N. Thibos and A. Bradley, “The limits of performance in central and peripheral vision,” in Vol. 22 of Society for Information Display Digest of Technical Papers (Society for Information Display, Santa Ana, Calif., 1991), pp. 301-303.
5. J. Larimer, “Designing tomorrow’s displays,” NASA Tech. Briefs 17(4), 14-16 (1993).
6. J. Lubin, “A visual discrimination model for imaging system design and evaluation,” in Vision Models for Target Detection, E. Peli, ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), pp. 245-283.
7. E. Peli, R. B. Goldstein, G. M. Young, C. L. Trempe, and S. M. Buzney, “Image enhancement for the visually impaired: Simulations and experimental results,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 32, 2337-2350 (1991).
8. E. Peli, “Contrast in complex images,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 2032-2040 (1990).
9. S. Daly, “The visual differences predictor: An algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity,” in Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display III, B. E. Rogowitz, ed., Proc. SPIE 1666, 2-15 (1992).
10. M. Duval-Destin, “A spatio-temporal complete description of contrast,” in Vol. 22 of Society for Information Display Digest of Technical Papers (Society for Information Display, Santa Ana, Calif., 1991), pp. 615-618.
11. E. Peli, J. Yang, and R. Goldstein, “Image invariance with changes in size: The role of peripheral contrast thresholds,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8, 1762-1774 (1991).
12. E. Peli, “Test of a model of foveal vision by using simulations,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 1131-1138 (1996).
13. E. Peli, “Contrast sensitivity function and image discrimnation,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 283-293 (2001).
14. E. L. Schwartz, “Spatial mapping in the primate sensory projection: Analytic structure and relevance to perception,” Biol. Cybern. 25, 181-194 (1977).
15. A. B. Watson, “Estimation of local spatial scale,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 1579-1582 (1987).
16. A. Johnston, “Spatial scaling of central and peripheral contrast-sensitivity functions,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 1583-1593 (1987).
17. J. S. Pointer and R. F. Hess, “The contrast sensitivity gradient across the human visual field with emphasis on the low spatial frequency range,” Vision Res. 29, 1133-1151 (1989).
18. M. W. Cannon, Jr., “Perceived contrast in the fovea and periphery,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 1760-1768 (1985).
19. W. Weibull, “A statistical distribution function of wide applicability,” J. Appl. Mech. 18, 293-297 (1951).
20. E. Peli and G. Geri, “Putting simulations of peripheral vision to the test,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 34 (ARVO Suppl.), 820 (1993).
21. E. Peli, “Simulating normal and low vision,” in Vision Models for Target Detection and Recognition, E. Peli, ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), pp. 63-87.
22. E. Peli, L. Arend, G. Young, and R. Goldstein, “Contrast sensitivity to patch stimuli: Effects of spatial bandwidth and temporal presentation,” Spatial Vis. 7, 1-14 (1993).
23. A. B. Watson, “The cortex transform: Rapid computation of simulated neural images,” Comput. Vision Graph. Image Process. 39, 311-327 (1987).
24. J. S. Lauritzen, S. M. Hood, D. J. Tolhurst, Y. Tadmor, and A. Pelah, “Detection of Gabor patches embedded in natural images,” Perception 27, 151-152 (1998).
25. W. S. Geisler and J. S. Perry, “A real-time foveated multi-resolution system for low-bandwidth video communication,” in Human Vision and Electronic Imaging III, B. Rogowitz and T. Pappas, eds., Proc. SPIE 3299, 294-305 (1998).