High-precision, charge-dependent Bonn nucleon-nucleon potential

Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 240011-2400132

  Machleidt, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035255922     PISSN: 05562813     EISSN: 1089490X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.63.024001     Document Type: Article

References (129)

1. R. Machleidt, K. Holinde, and Ch. Elster, Phys. Rep. 149, 1 (1987).
2. R. Machleidt, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 19, 189 (1989).
3. G. Q. Li and R. Machleidt, Phys. Rev. C 58, 1393 (1998).
4. J. A. Nolen and J. P. Schiffer, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 19, 471 (1969).
5. H. Müther, A. Polls, and R. Machleidt, Phys. Lett. B 445, 259 (1999).
6. G. Q. Li and R. Machleidt, Phys. Rev. C 58, 3153 (1998).
7. R. Machleidt, Brueckner Theory of Nuclear Matter with Non-nucleonic Degrees of Freedom and Relativity, Vol. 3 of Advances in Quantum Many-Body Theory (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000), p. 247.
8. Particle Data Group, C. Caso et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 3, 1 (1998).
9. Particle Data Group, D. E. Groom et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 15, 1 (2000); see, in particular, pp. 27, 405, 406, and 437-441.
10. R. Machleidt, F. Sammarruca, and Y. Song, Phys. Rev. C 53, R1483 (1996).
11. W. Grein and P. Kroll, Nucl. Phys. A338, 332 (1980).
12. L. Tiator, C. Bennhold, and S. S. Kamalov, Nucl. Phys. A580, 455 (1994); M. Kirchbach and L. Tiator, ibid. A604, 385 (1996).
13. L. Tiator, C. Bennhold, and S. S. Kamalov, Nucl. Phys. A580, 455 (1994); M. Kirchbach and L. Tiator, ibid. A604, 385 (1996).
14. V. Stoks, R. Timmermans, and J. J. de Swart, Phys. Rev. C 47, 512 (1993).
15. R. G. E. Timmermans, Few-Body Syst., Suppl. 9, 169 (1995); πN Newsletter 13, 80 (1997); Nucl. Phys. A631, 343c (1998).
16. R. G. E. Timmermans, Few-Body Syst., Suppl. 9, 169 (1995); πN Newsletter 13, 80 (1997); Nucl. Phys. A631, 343c (1998).
17. R. G. E. Timmermans, Few-Body Syst., Suppl. 9, 169 (1995); πN Newsletter 13, 80 (1997); Nucl. Phys. A631, 343c (1998).
18. R. A. Arndt, I. I. Strakovsky, and R. L. Workman, Phys. Rev. C 50, 2731 (1994); 52, 2246 (1995).
19. R. A. Arndt, I. I. Strakovsky, and R. L. Workman, Phys. Rev. C 50, 2731 (1994); 52, 2246 (1995).
20. R. A. Arndt, R. L. Workman, and M. M. Pavan, Phys. Rev. C 49, 2729 (1994).
21. M. M. Pavan, R. A. Arndt, I. I. Strakovsky, and R. L. Workman, Phys. Scr. T87, 65 (2000).
22. R. Machleidt, Phys. Scr. T87, 47 (2000).
23. R. Machleidt and M. K. Banerjee, Few-Body Syst. 28, 139 (2000).
24. We use the notation and conventions of J. D. Bjorken and S. D. Drell, Relativistic Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964); moreover - throughout this paper - we use units such that (latin small letter h with stroke)=c=1.
25. R. Blankenbecler and R. Sugar, Phys. Rev. 142, 1051 (1966).
26. E. E. Salpeter and H. A. Bethe, Phys. Rev. 84, 1232 (1951).
27. R. Machleidt, in Nuclear Forces and Nuclear Structure, Proceedings of Nuclear Structure 98, Gatlinburg, Tennessee, 1998, edited by C. Baktash, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 481 (AIP, Woodbury, New York, 1999), p. 3.
28. G. A. Miller and W. H. T. van Oers, in Symmetries and Fundamental Interactions in Nuclei, edited by W. C. Haxton and E. M. Henley (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), p. 127.
29. G. A. Miller, M. K. Nefkens, and I. Slaus, Phys. Rep. 194, 1 (1990).
30. C. R. Howell et al., Phys. Lett. B 444, 252 (1998).
31. D. E. González Trotter et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3788 (1999).
32. np=2.77±0.05); however, note that these values are highly model dependent, since the two experimental quantities that the analysis is based upon [namely, the np total cross section at "zero" energy and the (n,p) coherent scattering length] determine only the two np scattering lengths and not the effective ranges. A better way to determine the effective ranges is to simply use the predictions from modern high-precision NN potentials which reproduce the empirical values for the scattering lengths accurately (such as the CD-Bonn potential).
33. np=2.77±0.05); however, note that these values are highly model dependent, since the two experimental quantities that the analysis is based upon [namely, the np total cross section at "zero" energy and the (n,p) coherent scattering length] determine only the two np scattering lengths and not the effective ranges. A better way to determine the effective ranges is to simply use the predictions from modern high-precision NN potentials which reproduce the empirical values for the scattering lengths accurately (such as the CD-Bonn potential).
34. np=2.77±0.05); however, note that these values are highly model dependent, since the two experimental quantities that the analysis is based upon [namely, the np total cross section at "zero" energy and the (n,p) coherent scattering length] determine only the two np scattering lengths and not the effective ranges. A better way to determine the effective ranges is to simply use the predictions from modern high-precision NN potentials which reproduce the empirical values for the scattering lengths accurately (such as the CD-Bonn potential).
35. np=2.77±0.05); however, note that these values are highly model dependent, since the two experimental quantities that the analysis is based upon [namely, the np total cross section at "zero" energy and the (n,p) coherent scattering length] determine only the two np scattering lengths and not the effective ranges. A better way to determine the effective ranges is to simply use the predictions from modern high-precision NN potentials which reproduce the empirical values for the scattering lengths accurately (such as the CD-Bonn potential).
36. O. Dumbrajs, R. Koch, H. Pilkuhn, G. C. Oades, H. Behrens, J. J. de Swart, and P. Kroll, Nucl. Phys. B216, 277 (1983).
37. J. J. de Swart, C. P. F. Terheggen, and V. G. J. Stoks, nucl-th/9509032.
38. n while keeping all meson parameters (including the ones for the σ's) unchanged.
39. lab , the c.m. momentum q is larger for nn scattering as compared to pp. Both effects cause small difference in the phase shifts. Numbers listed in column "kinematics" of Table III include both effects.
40. Since CD-Bonn is an OBE model, it does not include the TBE (and πγ) diagrams explicitly. Therefore, we parametrize the TBE predicted by the Bonn full model (and the πγ contributions) by adjusting the parameters of the two σ mesons of CD-Bonn such that the above charge-dependence is accurately reproduced. For more details, see Sec. IV.
41. V. G. J. Stoks, R. A. M. Klomp, C. P. F. Terheggen, and J. J. de Swart, Phys. Rev. C 49, 2950 (1994).
42. R. B. Wiringa, V. G. J. Stoks, and R. Schiavilla, Phys. Rev. C 51, 38 (1995).
43. T. Goldman, J. A. Henderson, and A. W. Thomas, Few-Body Syst. 12, 193 (1992).
44. J. Piekarewicz and A. G. Williams, Phys. Rev. C 47, 2462 (1993).
45. G. Krein, A. W. Thomas, and A. G. Williams, Phys. Lett. B 317, 293 (1993).
46. H. B. O'Connell, B. C. Pearce, A. W. Thomas, and A. G. Williams, Phys. Lett. B 336, 1 (1994).
47. S. A. Coon, B. H. J. McKellar, and A. A. Rawlinson, in Intersections Between Nuclear and Particle Physics, edited by T. W. Donelly, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 412 (AIP, Woodbury, New York, 1997), p. 368.
48. H. B. O'Connell, B. C. Pearce, A. W. Thomas, and A. G. Williams, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 39, 201 (1997).
49. S. A. Coon and M. D. Scadron, Rev. Mex. Fis. (to be published).
50. U. van Kolck, M. C. M. Rentmeester, J. L. Friar, T. Goldman, and J. J. de Swart, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4386 (1998).
51. 0 such that the empirical np data are reproduced.
52. lab).
53. V. G. J. Stoks, R. A. M. Klomp, M. C. M. Rentmeester, and J. J. de Swart, Phys. Rev. C 48, 792 (1993).
54. 2π/4π = 13.6 instead of 14.4). These predictions are typically about 5% smaller than what was reported in Ref. [6].
55. V. Stoks and J. J. de Swart, Phys. Rev. C 47, 761 (1993).
56. R. A. Arndt, I. I. Strakovsky, and R. L. Workman, SAID, Scattering Analysis Interactive Dial-in computer facility, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and George Washington University, solution SM99, 1999 (unpublished); see also Ref. [15].
57. J. R. Bergervoet, P. C. van Campen, W. A. van der Sanden, and J. J. de Swart, Phys. Rev. C 38, 15 (1988).
58. V. G. J. Stoks (private communication).
59. W. A. van der Sanden, A. H. Emmen, and J. J. de Swart, Report No. THEF-NYM-83.11, Nijmegen, 1983 (unpublished); quoted in Ref. [50].
60. J. R. Bergervoet, P. C. van Campen, R. A. M. Klomp, J.-L. de Kok, T. A. Rijken, V. G. J. Stoks, and J. J. de Swart, Phys. Rev. C 41, 1435 (1990).
61. W. Kretschmer et al., Phys. Lett. B 328, 5 (1994).
62. F. Rathmann et al., Phys. Rev. C 58, 658 (1998).
63. B. Lorentz, Ph. D. thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1998; B. Lorentz et al., Phys. Rev. C 61, 054002 (2000).
64. B. Lorentz, Ph. D. thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1998; B. Lorentz et al., Phys. Rev. C 61, 054002 (2000).
65. W. Haeberli et al., Phys. Rev. C 55, 597 (1997).
66. S. W. Wissink et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4498 (1999).
67. B. v. Przewoski et al., Phys. Rev. C 58, 1897 (1998).
68. H. Dombrowski, A. Khoukaz, and R. Santo, Nucl. Phys. A619, 97 (1997).
69. W. S. Wilburn, C. R. Gould, D. G. Haase, P. R. Huffman, C. D. Keith, N. R. Roberson, and W. Tornow, Phys. Rev. C 52, 2351 (1995).
70. B. W. Raichle, C. R. Gould, D. G. Haase, M. L. Seely, J. R. Walston, W. Tornow, W. S. Wilburn, S. I. Penttilä, and G. W. Hoffman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2711 (1999).
71. W. Buerkle and G. Mertens, Few-Body Syst. 22, 11 (1997).
72. P. Clotten, P. Hempen, K. Hofenbitzer, V. Huhn, W. Metschulat, M. Schwindt, L. Wätzold, Ch. Weber, and W. von Witsch, Phys. Rev. C 58, 1325 (1998).
73. J. Brož et al., Z. Phys. A 354, 401 (1996).
74. J. Brož et al., Z. Phys. A 359, 23 (1997).
75. C. A. Davis et al., Phys. Rev. C 53, 2052 (1996).
76. A. Ahmidouch et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 2, 627 (1998).
77. J. Ball et al., Nucl. Phys. A559, 489 (1993).
78. J. Ball et al., Nucl. Phys. A574, 697 (1994).
79. J. Goetz et al., Nucl. Phys. 4574, 467 (1994).
80. S. Benck, I. Slypen, V. Corcalciuc, and J.-P. Meulders, Nucl. Phys. A615, 220 (1997).
81. J. Rahm et al., Phys. Rev. C 57, 1077 (1998).
82. J. Franz, E. Rössle, H. Schmitt, and L. Schmitt, Phys. Scr. T87, 14 (2000).
83. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Critical Points in the Determination of the Pion-Nucleon Coupling Constant, Uppsala, Sweden, 1999, edited by J. Blomgren [Phys. Scr. T87, 1 (2000)].
84. C. van der Leun and C. Alderlisten, Nucl. Phys. A380, 261 (1982).
85. T. E. O. Ericson and M. Rosa-Clot, Nucl. Phys. A405, 497 (1983).
86. N. L. Rodning and L. D. Knutson, Phys. Rev. C 41, 898 (1990).
87. F. Schmidt-Kaler, D. Leibfried, M. Weitz, and T. W. Hänsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2261 (1993); K. Pachucki, M. Weitz, and T. W. Hänsch, Phys. Rev. A 49, 2255 (1994); J. Martorell, D. W. L. Sprung, and D. C. Zheng, Phys. Rev. C 51, 1127 (1995).
88. F. Schmidt-Kaler, D. Leibfried, M. Weitz, and T. W. Hänsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2261 (1993); K. Pachucki, M. Weitz, and T. W. Hänsch, Phys. Rev. A 49, 2255 (1994); J. Martorell, D. W. L. Sprung, and D. C. Zheng, Phys. Rev. C 51, 1127 (1995).
89. F. Schmidt-Kaler, D. Leibfried, M. Weitz, and T. W. Hänsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2261 (1993); K. Pachucki, M. Weitz, and T. W. Hänsch, Phys. Rev. A 49, 2255 (1994); J. Martorell, D. W. L. Sprung, and D. C. Zheng, Phys. Rev. C 51, 1127 (1995).
90. D. M. Bishop and L. M. Cheung, Phys. Rev. A 20, 381 (1979).
91. H. Henning (private communication).
92. R. Machleidt and F. Sammarruca, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 564 (1991).
93. A. Polls, H. Müther, R. Machleidt, and M. Hjorth-Jensen, Phys. Lett. B 432, 1 (1998).
94. H. Arenhövel, F. Ritz, and T. Wilbois, Phys. Rev. C 61, 034002 (2000).
95. D. Abbott et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5053 (2000).
96. D. R. Phillips, S. J. Wallace, and N. K. Devine, nucl-th/9906086. The result of this calculation is represented by the short-dashed curve in Fig. 1 of Ref. [85].
97. J. Carbonell and V. A. Karmanov, Eur. Phys. J. A 6, 9 (1999). The result of this calculation is represented by the long-dashed curve in Fig. 1 of Ref. [85].
98. L. Engvik, M. Hjorth-Jensen, R. Machleidt, H. Müther, and A. Polls, Nucl. Phys. A627, 85 (1997).
99. J. L. Friar et al., Phys. Lett. B 311, 4 (1993).
100. A. Nogga, H. Kamada, and W. Glöckle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 944 (2000).
101. P. Navratil, G. P. Kamuntavicius, and B. R. Barrett, Phys. Rev. C 61, 044001 (2000).
102. F. Sammarruca, D. P. Xu, and R. Machleidt, Phys. Rev. C 46, 1636 (1992).
103. G. Rupp and J. A. Tjon, Phys. Rev. C 45, 2133 (1992).
104. F. Sammarruca and R. Machleidt, Few-Body Syst. 24, 87 (1998).
105. P. J. Siemens and A. P. Vischer, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 238, 129, 167 (1995).
106. M. F. Jiang, R. Machleidt, D. B. Stout, and T. T. S. Kuo, Phys. Rev. C 46, 910 (1992).
107. F. Andreozzi, L. Coraggio, A. Covello, A. Gargano, T. T. S. Kuo, Z. B. Li, and A. Porrino, Phys. Rev. C 54, 1636 (1996); F. Andreozzi, L. Coraggio, A. Covello, A. Gargano, T. T. S. Kuo, and A. Porrino, ibid. 56, R16 (1997); 59, 746 (1999); L. Coraggio, A. Covello, A. Gargano, N. Itaco, and T. T. S. Kuo, ibid. 60, 064306 (1999); nucl-th/0002021.
108. F. Andreozzi, L. Coraggio, A. Covello, A. Gargano, T. T. S. Kuo, Z. B. Li, and A. Porrino, Phys. Rev. C 54, 1636 (1996); F. Andreozzi, L. Coraggio, A. Covello, A. Gargano, T. T. S. Kuo, and A. Porrino, ibid. 56, R16 (1997); 59, 746 (1999); L. Coraggio, A. Covello, A. Gargano, N. Itaco, and T. T. S. Kuo, ibid. 60, 064306 (1999); nucl-th/0002021.
109. F. Andreozzi, L. Coraggio, A. Covello, A. Gargano, T. T. S. Kuo, Z. B. Li, and A. Porrino, Phys. Rev. C 54, 1636 (1996); F. Andreozzi, L. Coraggio, A. Covello, A. Gargano, T. T. S. Kuo, and A. Porrino, ibid. 56, R16 (1997); 59, 746 (1999); L. Coraggio, A. Covello, A. Gargano, N. Itaco, and T. T. S. Kuo, ibid. 60, 064306 (1999); nucl-th/0002021.
110. F. Andreozzi, L. Coraggio, A. Covello, A. Gargano, T. T. S. Kuo, Z. B. Li, and A. Porrino, Phys. Rev. C 54, 1636 (1996); F. Andreozzi, L. Coraggio, A. Covello, A. Gargano, T. T. S. Kuo, and A. Porrino, ibid. 56, R16 (1997); 59, 746 (1999); L. Coraggio, A. Covello, A. Gargano, N. Itaco, and T. T. S. Kuo, ibid. 60, 064306 (1999); nucl-th/0002021.
111. J. Suhonen, J. Toivanen, A. Holt, T. Engeland, E. Osnes, and M. Hjorth-Jensen, Nucl. Phys. A628, 41 (1998); A. Holt, T. Engeland, M. Hjorth-Jensen, and E. Osnes, ibid. A634, 41 (1998).
112. J. Suhonen, J. Toivanen, A. Holt, T. Engeland, E. Osnes, and M. Hjorth-Jensen, Nucl. Phys. A628, 41 (1998); A. Holt, T. Engeland, M. Hjorth-Jensen, and E. Osnes, ibid. A634, 41 (1998).
113. A user-friendly computer code for the CD-Bonn potential can be obtained from the author upon request.
114. F. Gross, Phys. Rev. C 26, 2203 (1982).
115. R. Woloshyn and A. D. Jackson, Nucl. Phys. B64, 269 (1973).
116. G. E. Brown, A. D. Jackson, and T. T. S. Kuo, Nucl. Phys. A133, 481 (1969).
117. R. H. Landau, Quantum Mechanics II (Wiley, New York, 1990).
118. M. Jacob and G. C. Wick, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 7, 404 (1959).
119. K. Erkelenz, R. Alzetta, and K. Holinde, Nucl. Phys. A176, 413 (1971).
120. M. Haftel and F. Tabakin, Nucl. Phys. A158, 1 (1970).
121. R. Machleidt, in Computational Nuclear Physics 2 - Nuclear Reactions, edited by K. Langanke, J.A. Maruhn, and S.E. Koonin (Springer, New York, 1993), Chap. 1, pp. 1-29.
122. J. Blatt and L. Biedenharn, Phys. Rev. 86, 399 (1952).
123. H. P. Stapp, T. J. Ypsilantis, and N. Metropolis, Phys. Rev. 105, 302 (1957).
124. M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Dover, New York, 1970).
125. G. Breit, Phys. Rev. 99, 1581 (1955).
126. G. J. M. Austin and J. J. de Swart, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 2039 (1983).
127. C. M. Vincent and S. C. Phatak, Phys. Rev. C 10, 391 (1974).
128. K. Holinde and R. Machleidt, Nucl. Phys. A247, 495 (1975).
129. M. Lacombe, B. Loiseau, J. M. Richard, R. Vinh Mau, J. Côté, P. Pires, and R. de Tourreil, Phys. Lett. 101B, 139 (1981).