Semantic value of plants in the perception of space

Building and Environment

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 257-279

  Özbilen, Ali ^a   Kalin, Arzu ^a  

^a Karadeniz Tecnical University   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; PLANTS (BOTANY);

SEMANTIC VALUE; SYMBOLIC PLANTS;

INTERIORS (BUILDING);

EID: 0035254675     PISSN: 03601323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1323(99)00058-X     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Aydinli S. Mimarlikta Estetik Deǧerler. In: i.T.Ü. Mimarlik fakültesi baski. istanbul: Atölyesi, 1993.
2. Cherulnik DP, Vilderman KS. Symbol of status in urban neighborhoods: contemporary perceptions of nineteenth century. Environment and Behavior 1986;18(5):604-22.
3. Adam M. Modern mimarliǧin ötesi: aldo rossi ve mimarlik düşüncesi. Mimarlik Dergisi 1984;7(8):20-8.
4. Davies D. In: Losgrove D, Deniels S, editors. The evocative symbolism of trees, the iconography of landscape: essays on the symbolic representation, design and use of past environments. Cambridge: Cambridge Universtiy Press, 1989. p. 32-42.
5. Cooper CJ. An illustrated encyclopedia of traditional symbols. 1st ed. London: Thomas and Hudson Ltd, 1979.
6. Daniels S. The political iconography of woodland in later Georginal England. In: Cosgrove D, Deniels S, editors. The iconography of landscape: essays on the symbolic representation, design and use of past environments. Cambridge: Cambridge Universtiy Press, 1989. p. 43-82.
7. Grillo SP. Form and function. 2nd ed. New York: Dave Publications, Inc, 1960.
8. Arrien A. Signs of life: five universal shapes and how to use them. Hong Kong: Arcus Publishing Company, 1992.
9. Evyapan, Asnaloǧlu G. Eski Türk Bahçeleri ve Özellikle Eski istanbul Bahçeleri, O.D.T.Ü. Mimarlik Fakültesi, Mimarlik Bölümü, Yayin No: 20, Başnur Matbaasi, Ankara, 1972.
10. Özek V. Mimarlikta gösterge ve simge eşik aşamasinin belirlenmesi. In: Doktora Tezi. Trabzon: K.T.Ü. inşaat ve Mimarlik Fakültesi Yayini, 1983.
11. Barthes R. Mythologies. London: Palladin, 1973.
12. Tanyeli U, Tarih. Tasarim ve mimarliktan yararlanma üzerine gözlemler. Mimarlik Dergisi 1988;228(6):61-4.
13. Fiske J. In: irvanli S, editor. iletişim Çalişmalarina Giriş. Ankara: Bilim Sanat Yayinlari/Ark, 1996.
14. Guiraud P. In: Yalçin M, editor. Göstergebilim. imge Kitabevi: ikinci Baski, 1994.
15. Aksoy E. Mimarlikta tasarim bilgisi. Ankara: Hatipoǧlu Yayinevi, 1987.
16. Küller R. Semantic evaluation of perceived environment: a cross-cultural replication. Man-Environment Systems 1979;9(67).
17. Küller R. A semantic test for use in cross-cultural studies. Man-Environment Systems 1979;9(67):253-6.
18. Hershberger GR. Toward a set of semantic scales to measure the meaning of architecture environments. In: Mitchell WJ, editor. Proceedings of The EDRA 3/ar & Conferance [special issue]. EDRA 3 1972;6(4):1-6.
19. Kalipsiz A. istatistik yöntemler. istanbul: Doyuran Matbaasi, 1988.
20. Harman HH. Modern factor analysis. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1970.