Comparison of different combustion models in enclosure fire simulation

Fire Safety Journal

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 37-54

  Xue, H ^a   Ho, J C ^a   Cheng, Y M ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUOYANCY; COMBUSTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEAT RADIATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; REYNOLDS NUMBER;

ENCLOSURE FIRE SIMULATION;

FLAME RESEARCH;

EID: 0035254095     PISSN: 03797112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0379-7112(00)00043-6     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Jones WW. A review of compartment fire models. NBSIR 83-2684, 1983. p. 1-38.
2. Duong D.Q. The accuracy of computer fire models. some comparisons with experimental data from Asutrlia Fire Safety J. 16:1990;415-431.
3. Dembsey N.A., Pagni P.J., Williamson R.B. Compartment fire experiments. comparison with models Fire Safety J. 25:1995;187-227.
4. Peacock R.D., Reneke P.A., Forney C.L., Kostreva M.M. Issues in evaluation of complex fire models. Fire Safety J. 30:1998;103-136.
5. Yang K.T. Recent development in field modelling of compartment fires. JSME Int J Ser B. 37(4):1994;702-717.
6. Beard A.N. Fire models and design. Fire Safety J. 28:1997;117-138.
7. Cox G., Kumar S. Fielding modeling of fire in forced ventilated enclosures. Combustn Sci Techol. 52:1987;7-23.
8. Magnussen BF, Hjertager BH. On mathematical models of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion. 16th Symposium (International) on Combustion, Cambridge, MA, 1976. p. 719-29.
9. Goldin G.M., Menon S. A comparison of scalar PDF turbulent combustion models. Combust Flame. 113:1998;442-453.
10. Eaton A.M., Smoot L.D., Hill S.C., Eatough C.N. Components, formulations, solutions, evaluations, and applications of comprehensive combustion models. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 25:1999;387-436.
11. Rodi W. Turbulence models and their applications in hydraulics - a state-of-the-art review. Book Publication of International Association for Hydraulic Research, Delft, Netherlands, 1984.
12. Xue H., Hihara E., Saito T. Modeling of airflow in a fire tunnel (1st report, study of two-dimensional turbulence model). Trans Jpn Soc Mech Eng. 57(536):1991;1457-1462. (in Japanese).
13. Hossain MS. Mathematische Modellierung von Turbulenten Auftruebsstromun-gen. PhD thesis, University of Karlsruhe, Germany, 1980.
14. Spalding DB. Mixing and chemical reaction in steady confined turbulent flames. 13th Symposium (International) on Combustion, Salt Lake City, UT, 1970.
15. Sivathann Y.R., Faeth G.M. Generalized state relationship for scalar properties in non-premixed hydrocarbon/air flame. Combust Flame. 82:1990;211-230.
16. Jones W.P., Whitelaw J.H. Calculation methods for reacting turbulent flows. a review Combust Flame. 48:1982;1-26.
17. Carvalho M.G., Farias T., Fontes P. Predicting radiative heat transfer in absorbing, emitting, and scattering media using the discrete transfer method. Fund Radiat Heat Transfer, ASME HTD. 160:1991;17-26.
18. Fluent Inc. Fluent 4.4 user's guide. Lebanon, NA, 1996.
19. Leonard B.P. A stable and accurate convective modelling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engng. 19:1979;59-98.
20. Steckler KD, Quintiere JG, Rinkinen WJ. Flow induced by fire in a compartment. National Bureau of Standards, Center for Fire Research, NBSIR 82-2520, 1982.
21. Lewis MJ, Moss MB, Rubini, PA. CFD modeling of combustion and heat transfer in compartment fires. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Fire Safety Science, IAFSS, 1997. p. 463-74.
22. Markatos N.C., Malin M.R., Cox G. Mathematical modelling of buoyancy-induced smoke flow in enclosures. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 25:1982;63-74.
23. Xue H., Chew T.C., Tay K.L., Cheng Y.M. Control of ventilation airflow for tunnel fire safety. Combust Sci Technol. 152:2000;179-196.
24. Moss J.B., Stewart C.D. Flamelet-based smoke properties for the field modelling of fires. Fire Safety J. 30:1998;229-250.