Integrated approach for the configuration of automated manufacturing systems

Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing

Volumn 17, Issue 1-2, 2001, Pages 19-26

  Matta, A ^a   Tolio, T ^a   Karaesmen, F ^b   Dallery, Y ^b  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^b ECOLE CENTRALE PARIS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FACTORY AUTOMATION; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

UNPROFITABILITY;

COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING;

EID: 0035249162     PISSN: 07365845     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0736-5845(00)00033-8     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Buzacott J.A., Yao D.D. Flexible manufacturing systems. A review of analytical models Mgmt Sci. 32:1986;890-905.
2. Solot P., van Vliet M. Analytical models for FMS design optimization. a survey Int. J Flexible Manuf Systems. 6:1994;209-233.
3. Dallery Y., Frein Y. An efficient method to determine optimal configuration of a flexible manufacturing system. Ann Oper Res. 15:1988;207-225.
4. Dallery Y. On modeling flexible manufacturing systems using closed queueing networks. Large Scale Systems. 11:1986;109-119.
5. Starr P.J. Integration of simulation and analytical submodels for supporting manufacturing decisions. Int J Prod Res. 29:1991;1733-1746.
6. Dekleva J., Gaberc M. Two phase method for designing flexible manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Res. 32:1994;683-691.
7. Hochberg Y., Tamhane A. Multiple comparison procedures. 1987;Wiley, New York.
8. Matta A, Tolio T. High flexible and high productive manufacturing system architecture. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of Production Research, 1999.
9. Matta A., Tolio T., Karaesmen F., Dallery Y. A new system architecture compared with alternative production systems, Int J Prod Res. 38:2000;17.
10. Semeraro Q, Tabusso F, Tolio T. Loading of a highly productive and flexible manufacturing system. Proceeding of the Tenth International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing, MD USA, June 26-28, 2000. p. 910-9.
11. Grieco A, Karaesmen F, Dallery Y. Deliverables 9/2 and 10/2: configurable simulator and analytical tool. 12 Months Project Report, Brite EuRam Project No. CT97 0440, 1998.