Comparing instructional delivery methods for teaching computer systems performance analysis

IEEE Transactions on Education

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 35-40

  Lilja, D J ^a  

^a University of Minnesota   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer systems performance analysis; Continuing education; Distance education; Graduate education; Independent study

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; INTERNET; PERFORMANCE; STUDENTS;

FACE-TO-FACE INSTRUCTION; GRADUATE EDUCATION; INDEPENDENT STUDY; INSTRUCTIONAL DELIVERY METHOD; INTERACTIVE TELEVISION SYSTEM;

DISTANCE EDUCATION;

EID: 0035245582     PISSN: 00189359     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/13.912708     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Asynchronous learning networks: Alfred P. Sloan foundation's program in learning outside the classroom
2. How to lie with statistics: The correct way to summarize benchmark results
3. Characterizing computer performance with a single number
4. Hint benchmark ideal for fair C/S testing
5. Counterpoint: Here's a good hint on performance
6. Hint: A new way to measure computer performance
7. SPEC as a performance evaluation measure
8. Truth in SPEC benchmarks
9. Characterizing the performance space of shared-memory computers using micro-benchmarks
10. The paradyn parallel performance measurement tool
11. Tuning memory performance of sequential and parallel programs
12. On-the-fly circuit to measure the average working set size
13. Performance analysis and prediction of processor scheduling strategies in multiprogrammed shared-memory multi-processors
14. Efficient program tracing
15. Performance measurement intrusion and perturbation analysis
16. Technical correspondence: Remarks on choosing and implementing random number generators
17. Suggestions for teaching the engineering research process
18. The task of the referee
19. UNiversity of minnesota university industry television for education (UNITE) streaming video program
20. Virtual universities report robust enrollments for distance-education courses
21. Education at a distance: A report from the front