Outcomes of requests for summary judgments in federal sexual harassment cases: Policy capturing revisited

Sex Roles

Volumn 44, Issue 3-4, 2001, Pages 109-128

  Knapp, Deborah Erdos ^a   Heshizer, Brian P ^b  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035242146     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1010972718542     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Anderson, T. (1998). Supreme Court clarifies harassment claims. Security Management, 42(8), 81-84.
2. Baker, D. D., Terpstra, D. E., & Cutler, B. D. (1990). Perceptions of sexual harassment: A reexamination of gender differences. Journal of Psychology, 124, 409-416.
3. Barak, A., Pitterman, Y., & Yitzhaki, R. (1995). An empirical test of the role of power differential in originating sexual harassment. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 497-517.
4. Bingham, S., & Burleson, B. (1989). Multiple effects of messages with multiple goals: Some perceived outcomes of responses to sexual harassment. Human Communication Research, 16, 184-216.
5. Blancero, D. (1995). Non-union grievance systems: System characteristics and fairness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 84-88.
6. Boon, S. D., & Sulsky, L. M. (1997). Attributions of blame and forgiveness in romantic relationships: A policy-capturing study. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12(1), 19-44.
7. Brooks, L., & Perot, A. R. (1991). Reporting sexual harassment: Exploring a predictive model. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 31-57.
8. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, S. Ct. 97-569 (1998) [on-line]. Available: http://laws. findlaw.com/US/000/97-569.html
9. Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1994). Pay preference and job search decisions: A person-organization fit perspective. Personnel Psychology, 47, 317-348.
10. Code of Federal Regulations. (1998). Chapter XIV - Equal Employment Opportunity Commission part 1601 - Procedural regulations (Title 29, Vol. 4, Parts 900 to 1899). U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access [on-line]. Available: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/get-cfr.cgi?TITLE = 29 & PART = 1601 & SECTION = 21 & TYPE = TEXT
11. Crosby, L., & LeMay, S. A. (1998). Empirical determination of shipper requirements for motor carrier services: SERVQUAL, direct questioning, and policy capturing methods. Journal of Business Logistics, 19(1), 139-153.
12. Deshpande, S. P., & Joseph, J. (1994). Variation in compensation decisions by managers: An empirical investigation. Journal of Psychology, 128(1), 41-50.
13. Deshpande, S. P., & Schoderbek, P. P. (1993). Pay-allocations by managers: A policy-capturing approach. Human Relations, 46, 465-79.
14. Dulebohn, J., & Martocchio, J. (1998). Employees' perceptions of the distributive justice of pay raise decisions: A policy capturing approach. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 41-64.
15. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2001). Sexual harassment charges: EEOC & FEPAs combined: FY 1992-FY 2000 [on-line]. Available: http://www.eeoc.gov/stats/ harass.html
16. Faley, R. H., Knapp, D. E., Kustis, G. A., & DuBois, C. L. Z. (1995). Severity of sexual harassment: A multidimensional approach to classification. In C. DuBois (Chair), Sexual harassment: Results from public-sector, private-sector, and military data. Symposium presented at the Tenth Annual Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
17. Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, S. Ct. 97-282 (1998) [on-line]. Available: http://laws.findlaw. com/US/000/97-282.html
18. Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578-589.
19. Fitzgerald, L. F., Gelfand, M. J., & Drasgow, F. (1996). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Psychology, 17, 425-427.
20. Fitzgerald, L. F., & Ormerod, A. J. (1991). Perceptions of sexual harassment: The influence of gender and academic context. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 281-294.
21. Fitzgerald, L. F., Shullman, S. L., Bailey, N., Richards, M., Swecker, J., Gold, Y., Ormerod, M., & Weitzman, L. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 152-175.
22. General Accounting Office. (1993). Naval Academy: Gender and racial disparities (Document No. GAO/NSIAD-93-54). Washington, DC: Author.
23. Gelfand, M. J., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. (1995). The structure of sexual harassment: A confirmatory analysis across cultures and settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 7, 164-177.
24. Gibbons, G. (1998, March 13). Lawyers to lay out details of Paula Jones lawsuit. Reuters [on-line]. Available: http://www.infobeat.com
25. Glomb, T. M., Richman, W. L., Hulin, C. L., Drasgow, F., Schneider, K. T., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Ambient sexual harassment: An integrated model of antecedents and consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 309-328.
26. Graves, L. M., & Karren, R. J. (1992). Interviewer decision processes and effectiveness: An experimental policy-capturing investigation. Personnel Psychology, 45, 313-340.
27. Harbrecht, D. (1991, October 28). Bush may have won more than a new justice. Businessweek, 34-35.
28. Harrison, P. D., Ryan, J. M., & Moore, P. S. (1996). College students' self-insight and common implicit theories in rating of teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 775-782.
29. Jones, T. S., & Remland, M. S. (1992). Sources of variability in perceptions of and responses to sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 27, 121-142.
30. Knapp, D. E., & Kustis, G. A. (2001). Same-sex sexual harassment: A legal review with implications for organizational policy. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 12, 105-119.
31. Law, K. S., & Wong, C. S. (1998). Relative importance of referents on pay satisfaction: A review and test of a new policy-capturing approach. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 71(1), 47-60.
32. Littler-Bishop, S., Seidler-Feller, D., & Opaluch, R. E. (1982). Sexual harassment in the workplace as a function of initiator's status. The case of airline personnel. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 137-148.
33. Martocchio, J. J., & Judge, T. A. (1994). A policy-capturing approach to individuals' decisions to be absent. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 358-386.
34. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson, S. Ct. 477 U.S. 57 (1986).
35. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., et al., S. Ct. 96-568, LEXIS 1599 (1998).
36. Pablo, A. L. (1994). Determinants of acquisition integration level: A decision-making perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 803-836.
37. Packwood may run for the Oregon statehouse. (1998, April 9). Reuters [on-line]. Available: http://www.infobeat.com
38. Pargament, K. I., Sullivan, M. S., Balzer, W. K., & Van Haitsma, K. S. (1995). The many meanings of religiousness: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Personality, 63, 953-983.
39. Roehling, M. V. (1993). "Extracting" policy from judicial opinions: The dangers of policy capturing in a field setting. Personnel Psychology, 46, 477-502.
40. Rousseau, D. M., & Aquino, K. (1993). Fairness and implied contract obligations in job terminations: The role of remedies, social accounts, and procedural justice. Human Performance, 6(2), 135-149.
41. Satterwhite v. Smith, 744 F.2d 1380, 1381 LEXIS 17842 (9th Cir. 1984).
42. Spaeth, H. J. (1985). Supreme court disposition of federal circuit court decisions. Judicature, 68, 245-250.
43. Tommasi, G. W., Williams, K. B., & Nordstrom, C. R. (1998). Letters of recommendation: What information captures HR professionals' attention? Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 5-18.
44. Terpstra, D. E., & Baker, D. D. (1988). Outcomes of sexual harassment charges. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 185-194.
45. Terpstra, D. E., & Baker, D. D. (1992). Outcomes of federal court decisions on sexual harassment. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 180-190.
46. U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1981). Sexual harassment in the Federal workplace: Is it a problem? Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
47. U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1988). Sexual harassment in the Federal government: An update. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
48. U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1995). Sexual harassment in the Federal workplace, 1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
49. U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1999). About the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board [on-line]. Louisville, KY: University of Louisville Ekstrom Library Government Publications. Available: http://www.louisville.edu/library/ekstrom/govpubs/ federal/agencies/merit/merit.html
50. Werner, J. M., & Bolino, M. C. (1997). Explaining U.S. courts of appeals decisions involving performance appraisal: Accuracy, fairness, and validation. Personnel Psychology, 50, 1-24.
51. Wiederman, M. W., & Dubois, S. L. (1998). Evolution and sex differences in preferences for short-term mates: Results from a policy capturing study. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19(3), 153-170.
52. Wolf, J. (1998, March 4). Prosecution pummels U.S. Army's ex-top soldier. Reuters [on-line]. Available: http://www.infobeat.com
53. York, K. M. (1989). Defining sexual harassment in workplaces: A policy capturing approach. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 830-850.
54. York, K. M. (1992). A policy capturing analysis of federal district and appellate court sexual harassment cases. Employee Responsibilities & Rights Journal, 5(2), 173-184.