Computation of turbulent wake flows in variable pressure gradient

Computers and Fluids

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 161-187

  Carlson, J R ^a   Duquesne, N ^b   Rumsey, C L ^a   Gatski, T B ^a  

^a NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; LIFT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STRESS ANALYSIS; VISCOUS FLOW; WINGS;

LINEAR EDDY VISCOSITY MODELS; NONLINEAR EXPLICIT ALGEBRAIC STRESS MODELS;

WAKES;

PRESSURE GRADIENT; TURBULENT FLOW; VISCOSITY; WAKE;

EID: 0035241882     PISSN: 00457930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7930(00)00007-4     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Rumsey CL, Gatski TB, Ying SX, Bertelrud A. Prediction of high-lift flows using turbulent closure models. AIAA Journal 1998;36(5):765-74.
2. Ying SX, Spaid FW, McGinley CB, Rumsey CL. Investigation of confluent boundary layers in high-lift flows. Journal of Aircraft 1999;36(3):550-62.
3. Hill PG, Schaub UW, Senoo Y. Turbulent wakes in pressure gradients. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 1963;30(4):518-24.
4. Gartshore IS. Two-dimensional turbulent wakes. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1967;30(3):547-60.
5. Ramaprian BR, Patel VC. The symmetric turbulent wake of a flat plate. AIAA Journal 1978;20(9):80-9.
6. Marasli B, Champagne FH, Wygnanski I. On Linear evolution of unstable disturbances in a plane turbulent wake. Phys Fluids A 1991;3:665-74.
7. Hoffenberg R, Sullivan JP, Schneider SP, Wake measurements in a strong adverse pressure gradient. AIAA Paper 1995:95-1912.
8. Liu X, Thomas FO, Nelson RC, An experimental investigation of wake development in arbitrary pressure gradient. AIAA Paper 1999:99-0677.
9. Krist SL, Biedron RT, Rumsey CL, CFL3D user's manual (Version 5.0). NASA TM-1998-208444, June 1998.
10. Vos JB, Rizzi AW, Corjon A, Chaput E, Soinne E, Recent advances in aerodynamics inside the NSMB (Navier-Stokes Multi Block) consortium. AIAA Paper 1998:98-0225.
11. Abdol-Hamid KS, Implementation of algebraic stress models in general 3D Navier Stokes method (PAB3D). NASA CR-4702, December 1995.
12. Carlson JR. Applications of algebraic reynolds stress turbulence models. Part I: Incompressible flat plate. Journal of Propulsion and Power 1997;13(5):610-9.
13. Speziale CG, Abid R. Near wall integration of Reynolds stress turbulence closures with no wall damping. AIAA Journal 1995;33(10):1974-7.
14. Rumsey CL, Gatski TB, Morrison JH, Turbulence model predictions of extra-strain rate effects in strongly-curved flows. AIAA Paper 1999:99-0157.
15. Thomas FO, Private communication, 1999.
16. Liu X, A bias error correction method for LDV Reynolds stress measurements in the symmetric wake. University of Notre Dame Technical Memo No. 99-1, April 1999.
17. Jongen T, Gatski TB. General explicit algebraic stress relations and best approximation for three-dimensional flows. International Journal of Engineering Science 1998;36:739-63.
18. Pope SB. A more general effective viscosity hypothesis. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1975;72:331-40.
19. Gatski TB, Speziale CG. On explicit algebraic stress models for complex turbulent flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1993;254:59-78.
20. Speziale CG, Sarkar S, Gatski TB. Modeling the pressure-strain correlation of turbulence: an invariant dynamical systems approach. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1991;227:245-72.
21. Gatski TB, Rumsey CL, Linear and non-linear eddy viscosity models. In: Launder BE, Sandham ND, editors. Closure strategies for turbulent and transitional flows. Cambridge University Press, NY, 2000 (in press).
22. Yoon S, Jameson A, A multigrid LU-SOOR scheme for approximate Newton iteration applied to the euler equations. NASA-CR-179524, 1986.
23. Laufer J, Investigation of turbulent flow in a two-dimensional channel, NACA Report 1053, 1950.