|
|
|
Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 4-10
|
|
Learner retention of anatomical information presented in a digital two-dimensional format versus a digital three-dimensional format.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
ANATOMY;
ARTICLE;
BRAIN;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COMPUTER INTERFACE;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE;
EDUCATION;
HISTOLOGY;
HUMAN;
IMAGE PROCESSING;
MIDDLE AGED;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
PILOT STUDY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;
UNITED STATES;
VISION;
ADULT;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
ANATOMY, CROSS-SECTIONAL;
ANATOMY, REGIONAL;
BRAIN;
DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD;
HUMANS;
IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;
IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
MICHIGAN;
MIDDLE AGED;
PILOT PROJECTS;
USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;
VISUAL PERCEPTION;
|
|
EID: 0035238514
PISSN: 00942499
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (4)
|
|
References (0)
|
