Hemispheric specialization in quantification processes

Psychological Research

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 57-63

  Pasini, Margherita ^a,b   Tessari, Alessia ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

^c SISSA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MATHEMATICS; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; VISION; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; BRAIN; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MATHEMATICS; REACTION TIME; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0035236006     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s004260000036     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bagnara, S., Simion, F., & Umiltà, C. (1985). Perchè si fa prima a dire ≪ uguale ≫. In W. Gerbino (a cura di), Conoscenza e struttuta. Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino press.
2. Beckwith, M., & Restle, F. (1966). The process or enumeration. Psychological Review, 73, 437-444.
3. Boles, D. (1986). Hemispheric differences in the judgement of number. Neuropsychologia, 24, 511-519.
4. Bukley, P. B., & Gilman, C. B. (1974). Comparison of digits and dot patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103 1131-1136.
5. Carmon, A., Kleiner, M., & Nachshon, I. (1975). Visual hemifield effects in dichoptic presentation of digits. Neuropsychologia, 13, 289-295.
6. Cohen, G. (1973). Hemispheric differences in serial versus parallel processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 349-356.
7. Cohen, G. (1975). Hemisphere differences in the effects of cueing in visual recognition tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 366-373.
8. Corballis, M. C., & Sergent, J. (1992). Judgements about numerosity by a commissurotomized subject. Neuropsychologia, 30, 865-876.
9. Corcoran, D. W. J. (1971). Pattern recognition. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
10. Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44, 1-42.
11. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
12. Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1994). Dissociable mechanisms of subitizing and counting - Neuropsychological evidence from simultagnosic patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 958-975.
13. Diamond, S., & Beaumont, J. (1971). Use of two cerebral hemispheres to increase brain capacity. Nature, 232, 210-271.
14. Geffen, G., Bradshaw, J. L., & Wallace, G. (1971). Interhemispheric effects on reaction time to verbal and nonverbal visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87, 415-422.
15. Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M. W., Reese, T. W., & Wolkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. American Journal of Psychology, 62, 498-525.
17. Kimura, D. (1963). Right temporal lobe damage. Archives of Neurology, 8, 264-671.
18. Kimura, D. (1966). Dual functional asymmetry of the brain in visual perception. Neuropsychologia, 16, 593-600.
19. Kinsbourne, M. (1970). The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychologica: Attention and Performance, 33, 193-201.
20. Klarh, D. (1973). Quantification processes. In: W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing. New York: Academic Press.
21. Mandler, G., & Shebo, B. J. (1982). Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 1-22.
22. Moyer, R. S. (1973). Comparing objects in memory: evidence suggesting an internal psychophysics. Perception and Psychophysics, 13, 180-184.
23. Moyer, R. S., & Laudauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519-1520.
24. Reed, S. K. (1973). Psychological processing in pattern recognition. New York, Academy Press.
25. Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 274-278.
26. Sathian, K., Simon, T. J., Peterson, S., Patel, G. A., Hoffman, J. M., & Grafton, S. T. (1999). Neural evidence linking visual object enumeration and attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 36-51.
27. Seron, X., Deloche, G., Ferrand, I., Cornet, J. A., Frederix, M., & Hirsbrunner, T. (1991). Dot counting by brain damage subjects. Brain and Cognition, 17, 116-137.
28. Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Teng, E. L., & Sperry, R. W. (1974). Interhemispheric rivalry during simultaneous bilateral task presentation in commissurotomized patients. Cortex, 10, 111-120.
30. Trick, L., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101, 80-102.
31. Van Oeffelen, M., & Vos, P. G. (1982). Configurational effects on the enumeration of dots: counting by groups. Memory and Cognition, 10, 396-404.
32. Von Glasersfeld, E. (1982). Subitizing: the role of figurai patterns in the development of numerical concepts. Archives de Psychologie, 50, 191-218.
33. Warrington, E. K., & James, M. (1967). Tachiscopic number estimation in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions. Journal of Neurological and Neurosurgical Psychiatry, 30, 468-474.
34. Wolters, G., Kempen, H., & Wijlhuizen, G. (1987). Quantification small numbers of dots: subitizing or pattern recognition? American Journal of Psychology, 100, 225-237.
35. Young, A. W., & Bion, P. J. (1979). Hemispheric laterality effects in the enumeration of virtually presented collections of dots by children. Neuropsychologia, 17, 99-102.