Professional information about urinary incontinence on the world wide web: Is it timely? Is it accurate?

Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 55-62

  Diering, Colleen L ^a   Palmer, Mary H ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c New Jersey   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCREDITATION; ARTICLE; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; EDUCATION; EVALUATION; FACTUAL DATABASE; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SERVICE; INTERNET; NURSE; PATIENT EDUCATION; STANDARD; TIME; URINE INCONTINENCE; WRITING;

AUTHORSHIP; COMPUTER USER TRAINING; CREDENTIALING; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; INFORMATION SERVICES; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; NURSE CLINICIANS; PATIENT EDUCATION; TIME FACTORS; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 0035235592     PISSN: 10715754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mjw.2001.110622     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Wagner T, Hu T. Economic costs of urinary incontinence in 1995. Urology 1998;51:355-61.
2. Mitteness L. Knowledge and beliefs about urinary incontinence in adulthood and old age. J Am Geriatr Soc 1990;38:374-8.
3. Burgio K, Ives D, Locher J, Arena V, Kuller L. Treatment seeking for urinary incontinence in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994;42:208-12.
4. Lekan-Rutledge D, Palmer M, Belyea M. In their own words: nursing assistants' perceptions of barriers to implementation of prompted voiding in long-term care. Gerontologist 1998;38:370-8.
5. Ambre J, Guard R, Perveiler F, Renner J, Rippen H. Criteria for assessing the quality of health information on the Internet (working draft white paper). McLean (VA): Mitretek Systems: Health Information Technology Institute; 1999. Available from: URL: www.mitretek.org/hiti/showcase/documents/ criteria.html.
6. Biermann J, Golladay G, Greenfield M, Baker L. Evaluation of cancer information on the Internet. Cancer 1999;86:381-90.
7. Davison K, Guan S. The quality of dietary information on the World Wide Web. J Can Dietetic Assoc 1996;57:137-9.
8. Silberg W, Lundberg G, Musacchio R. Assessing, controlling, and assuring quality of medical information on the Internet. JAMA 1997;277: 1244-5.
9. Eysenbach G, Diepgen T. Towards quality management of medical information on the Internet: evaluation, labeling, and filtering of information. Br Med J 1999;317:1496-502.
10. Jadad A, Gagliardi A. Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? JAMA 1998;279:611-4.
11. Skov A. Separating the wheat from the chaff: Internet quality (database) (1998 Aug/Sept, 38-40). Available from: URL:www.onlineinc.com/ database.
12. Microsoft Word 95. Redmond (WA): Microsoft Corporation; 1995.
13. Sacchetti P, Zvara P, Plante M. The Internet and patient education - resources and their reliability: focus an a select urologic topic. Urology 1999;53: 1117-20.
14. Health on the Net (HON) code of conduct (1999). Available from: URL: http://www/hon.ch/ HONcode/index.html.
15. Norris J. The Internet: extending our capacity for scholarly inquiry in nursing. Nurs Sci Q 1999;12: 197-201.