Development of an experimental paradigm in which to examine human learning using two computer-based formats

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 81, Issue , 2001, Pages 187-191

  Hoffman, Helene M ^a   Colt, Henri G ^a   Haas, Ariel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; CURRICULA; EDUCATION COMPUTING; INFORMATION USE; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; PROBLEM SOLVING; STUDENTS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ANATOMIC STRUCTURES; ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS; CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT; IMMERSIVE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS; MICROSOFT POWERPOINT; MULTIMEDIA ENVIRONMENT; STRUCTURED PRESENTATIONS;

E-LEARNING;

ANATOMY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; HUMAN; TEACHING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANATOMY; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULUM; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 0035235139     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-925-7-187     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Rosse C, The Potential of Computerized Representations of Anatomy in the Training of Health Care Providers. Academic Medicine 70 (6): 499-505,1995
2. Yeager V., Learning Gross Anatomy: Dissection and Prosection. Clinical Anatomy 9(1): 57-9, 1996
3. Hubbell D., Byers P., McKeown P., Clinical Anatomy in struction in the Operating Room. Clinical Anatomy 9 (6): 405-7, 1996
4. Jones D., Reassessing the Importance of Dissection: A Critique and Elaboration. Clinical Anatomy 10:123-127, 1997
5. Carmichael S. W., Pawlina W., Animated PowerPoint as a Tool to Teach Anatomy. Anatomical Record 261(2): 83-8, 2000
6. Chen M. Y., Boehme J. M., Schwarz D. L., Liebkemann W. D., Bartholmai B. J., Wolfman N. T., Radiographic anatomy: Multi Media Interactive in struction al Software on CD-ROM. American Journal of Roentgenology 173(5): 1181-4, 1999
7. Microsoft PowerPoint (http://www. microsoft. com/office/powerpoint/ default. htm)
8. Hoffman H., Murray M., Irwin A. E., McCracken T., Developing a Virtual Reality Multi Media System for Anatomy Training. Studies in Health Technology Informatics 29:204-10, 1996
9. Hoffman H. M., Irwin A. E., Prayaga R., Danks M., Murray, M., Virtual Anatomy from the Visible Man: Creating Tools for Medical Education. In: Visible Human Project Conference Proceedings, NLM, Office of High Performance Computing and Communications, 1996
10. Hoffman H. M., Murray M., Danks M., Prayaga R., Irwin A. E., Vu, D., A Flexible and Extensible Object-Oriented 3 D Architecture: a n Application in the Development of Virtual Anatomy Lessons. Studies in Health Technology Informatics. (39): 461-466, 1997
11. Hoffman H., Murray M., Anatomic VisualizeR: Realizing the Vision of a VR-based Learning Environment. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 62:134-40, 1999
12. Ackerman M. J., The Visible H u Man Project. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86(3): 504-11, 1998
13. UCSD SOM Catalog (http://medschool. ucsd. edu/Catalog/78. html)
14. Montgomery J. R., Global Trend In Education: Shifting from A Teaching Focus To alearning. Focus. International Experiential Learning Conference, Nov. 9-12, Washington, DC, 1994
15. Lake D. A., Active Learning: Student Performance and Perceptions Compared With Lecture. Selected papers from the 11th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning, Jacksonville, FL., 119-124, 2000
16. Hetzroni O. E., Effects of Active versus Passive Computer in struction on the Learning of Element and Compound Blissymbols. Augmentative & Alternative Communication. June 16 (2): 95-106, 2000
17. Salzman M. C., Dede C, Bowen Loftin R., Chen J., A model for Understanding how Virtual Reality Aids Complex Conceptual Learning. Presence 8(3): 293-316, 1999
18. Garg A., Norman G. R., Spero L., Maheshwari P., Do Virtual Computer Models Hinder Anatomy Learning ? Academic Medicine 74:S87-S89,1999.