Subjectively perceived quality of life after coronary artery bypass surgery

American Journal of Critical Care

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 11-16

  Ross, Ashley Carmel ^a   Ostrow, Lynne ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFFECT; AGED; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIOECONOMICS; TIME;

ADULT; AFFECT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0035234149     PISSN: 10623264     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2001.10.1.11     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ferrans CE, Powers MJ. Quality of life index: development and psychometric properties. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. October 1985;8:15-24.
2. Papadantonaki A, Stotts NA, Paul SM. Comparison of quality of life before and after coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Heart Lung. 1994;23:45-52.
3. King KB, Porter LA, Norsen LH, Reis HT. Patient perceptions of quality of life after coronary artery bypass surgery: was it worth it? Res Nurs Health. 1992;15:327-334.
4. Oleson M. Subjectively perceived quality of life. Image J Nurs Sch. 1990;22:187-190.
5. Duits AA, Boeke S, Taams MA, Passchier J, Erdman RA. Prediction of quality of life after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a review and evaluation of multiple, recent studies. Psychosom Med. 1997;59:257-268.
6. Cameron I, Mahanonda N, Money C, et al. Outcome five years after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting for significant narrowing limited to the left anterior descending coronary artery. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:544-549.
7. Alderman EL, Andrews K, Brooks MM, et al. Five-year clinical and functional outcome comparing bypass surgery and angioplasty in patients with multivessel coronary disease. JAMA. 1997;277:715-721.
8. Holmes DR Jr, Van Raden MI, Reeder GS, et al. Return to work after coronary angioplasty: a report from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry. Am J Cardiol. 1984;53:48C-51C.
9. Hlatky MA, Charles ED, Nobrega F, et al. Initial functional and economic status of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease randomized in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:34C-41C.
10. Pocock SI, Henderson RA, Seed P, Treasure T, Hampton JR. Quality of life, employment status, and anginal symptoms after coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery. Circulation. 1996;94:135-142.
11. Folks DG, Blake DJ, Fleece L, Sokol RS, Freeman AM. Quality of life six months after coronary artery bypass surgery. South Med J. 1986;79:397-399.
12. Langeluddecke GF, Fulcher G, Baird D, Hughes C, Tennant C. A prospective evaluation of the psychosocial effects of coronary artery bypass surgery. J Psychosom Res. 1989,33:37-45.
13. McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF. Manual for the Profile of Mood States. San Diego, Calif: Educational and Industrial Testing Service; 1992.
14. Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT. The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? BMJ. 1993;306:1440-1443.
15. Jenkinson C, Wright CA, Coulter A. Criterion validity and reliability of the SF-36 in a population sample. Qual Life Res. 1994;3:7-12.