Association of microsatellite genomic heterozygosity with inbred pig performance under successive inbreeding

Acta Genetica Sinica

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 26-28

  Wu, Xiao Lin ^a,b   Li, Xun ^b   Fredholm, Merete ^c  

^a Hunan Institute of Animal and Veterinary Science   (China)

^b HUNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Beterozygosity; Genomic scanning; Inbreeding; Microsatellites; Pigs

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; GENETICS; GENOME; HETEROZYGOTE; INBREEDING; SWINE;

ANIMALS; GENOME; HETEROZYGOTE; INBREEDING; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; SWINE;

EID: 0035233956     PISSN: 03794172     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Mitton J B, Pierce B A. The distribution of individual heterozygosity in natural populations. Genetics, 1980, 95:1043-1054.
2. Lee M, Godshalk E B, Lamkey K R. Association of restriction fragment length polymorphisms among maize inbred with agronomic performance of their crosses. Crop Science, 1989, 29:1067-1071.
3. Godshalk E B, Li M, Lamkey K R. Relationship of restriction fragment length polymorphism to single-cross hybrid performance of maize. Theor. Appl. Genet, 1990, 80:273-280.
4. Dudley J W, Saghai M A, Rufener G K. Molecular marker information and grouping of parents in corn breeding programs. Crop Science, 1991, 31:718-723.
5. Dunnington E A, Stallard A C, Hillel J, Siegel P B. Genetic diversity among commercial chicken population estimated from DNA fingerprints. Poultry Sci., 1994, 73:1218-1225.
6. Zouros E, Foltz D W. Possible explanations of heterozygote deficiency in bivalve molluscs. Malacologia, 1984, 25:583-591.
7. Mallet A L et al. Larval vaibility and heterozygote deficiency in populations of marine bivarine: evidence from pair matings of mussels. Mar. Biol., 1985, 87:165-172.
8. Gaffney P M. Heterosis and heterozygote deficiencies in marine bivalves: more light? In: Genetics and Evolution of Aquatic Organisms, edited by A. R. Beaumnont. Chapman & Hall, London. 1994, 146-153.
9. Koehn R K, Shumway S E. A genetic/physiological explanation for differential growth rate among individual of the American oyster Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin). Mar. Biol. Lett., 1982, 3:35-42.
10. Nicolas B, Sophie L, Yamama N G, Francois B. Early effect of inbreeding as revealed by microsatellite analysis on Ostrea edulis larvae. Genetics, 1998, 148(4): 1893-1906.
11. Christensen K, Fredholm M, Wintero A K, Andersen S. Effect of identical Homozygosity on growth in pigs. In: Proc. 5th. World Congr. Genet. Appl. Lives. Prod., 1994, Vol. 19, 155-158.
12. Christensen K M Fredholm A K. Wintero, J N Jorgensen, S Andersen. Joint effect of 21 marker loci and effect of realized inbreeding on growth in pigs. Anim. Sci., 1996, 62:541-546.
13. Fredholm et al. Characterization of 24 porcine (dA-dC)n-(dT-dG)n microsatellites: genotyping of unrelated animals from four breeds and linkage studies. Mammalian Genome, 1993, 4:187-192.
14. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, 4th Edition, Volume 1, Cary, NC, USA, 1990, 891-996.
15. Falconer D S. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd ed., Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow, Essex, England, 1989.
16. Relationship of hybrid perfonnance with parental difference and hybrid heterozygosity in non-inbred populations. Anim. Biotech. Bull., 1998, 6:127-132.
17. Predicting heterosis through biochemical and RAPD markers in animal species. Anim. Biotech. Bull., 1998, 6:77-82.
18. Bernardo R. Relationship between single cross performance and molecular marker heterozygosity. Thero. Appl. Genet., 1992, 83:628-634.
19. McGoldrick D J, Hedgecock D. Fixation, segregation and linkage of allozyme loci in inbred families of the Pacific Oyster Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg): implications for the Causes of inbreeding depression. Genetics, 1997, 146:321-334.