Circular stapling procedure for mucosal prolapse of the rectum associated with outlet obstruction

Kurume Medical Journal

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 201-204

  Araki, Yasumi ^a   Ishibashi, Nobuya ^a   Kishimoto, Yukiya ^a   Matono, Keiko ^a   Nakagawa, Motonori ^a   Nozoe, Yasuhiro ^a   Sasatomi, Teruo ^a   Ogata, Yutaka ^a   Shirouzu, Kazuo ^a  

^a KURUME UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Circular stapling procedure; Mucosal prolapse

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTESTINE MUCOSA; INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RECTUM PROLAPSE; SURGICAL STAPLING;

FEMALE; HUMANS; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECTAL PROLAPSE; SURGICAL STAPLING;

EID: 0035233177     PISSN: 00235679     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2739/kurumemedj.48.201     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery 1988; 777-784.
2. Milito G, Cortese F, and Casciani CU. Surgical treatment of mucosal prolapse and haemorrhoids by stapler. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery 1988; 785-789.
3. Pescatori M, Favetta U, and Dedola S. Transanal stapled excision of rectal mucosa prolapse. Techniques in Coloproctology 1997; 1:96-98.
4. Fazio VW. Early promise of stapling technique for haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000; 355:768-769.
5. Rowsell M, Bello M, and Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355:782-785.
6. Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, and Chiumarulo C. Treatment of external mucosal prolapse with circular stapler: an easy and effective new surgical technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42:1102-1105.
7. Pemberton JH. Rectal prolapse. In: Atras of Colorectal Surgery, ed. Keighley MRB, Pemberton JH, Fazio VW and Parc R, Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 145-164, 1996.
8. Read MG, Read NW, and Haynes WG. A prospective study of the effect of haemorrhoidectomy on sphincter function and fecal continence. Br J Surg 1982; 69:396-398.
9. Read NW, Bartolo DCC, and Read MG. Differences in anorectal manometry between patients with hemorrhoids and patients with descending perineum syndrome: complication for management. Br J Surg 1983; 70:656-659.
10. Araki Y, Isomoto H, Tsuji Y, and Matsumoto A. Functional results of colonic J-pouch anastomosis for rectal cancer. Jpn J Surg 1999; 29:597-600.
11. Araki Y, Isomoto H, Tsuji Y, Matsumoto A, and Shirouzu K. Functional outcome of double-stapled and transanal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis after proctocolectomy. Kurume Med J 1998; 45:209-213.
12. Thomson WHF. The nature of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1975; 62:542-552.
13. Goliger JC. Rectal trends in the practice of sphincter-saving excision for rectal cancer. Ann Roy Coll Surg 1979; 61:169-176.
14. Waxman BP. Large bowel anastomosis: the circular stapler. Br J Surg 1983; 70:64-67.