Morphohistobiochemical characteristics of embryogenic and nonembryogenic callus cultures of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.)

Cytobios

Volumn 106, Issue 412, 2001, Pages 113-124

  Mukherjee, Archana ^a   Debata, B K ^b   Mukherjee, P S ^b   Malik, S K ^c  

^a Central Tuber Crops Research Institute Bhubaneswar   (India)

^b CSIR INSTITUTE OF MINERALS AND MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^c NATIONAL BUREAU OF PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES   (India)

Author keywords

Biochemical characteristics; Embryogenic callus; Histology; Ipomoea batatas; Morphology

Indexed keywords

2,4 DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID; CYTOKININ; PROLINE; PROTEIN; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ARTICLE; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; CELL CULTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECT; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; SWEET POTATO;

2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; CELLS, CULTURED; CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CYTOKININS; IPOMOEA BATATAS; PROLINE; PROTEINS; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

EID: 0035230449     PISSN: 00114529     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. AL MAZROOEI S., Bhatti M. H., Henshaw G. G., Taylor N. J. and Blakesley D. 1997. Optimisation of somatic embryogenesis in fourteen cultivars of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L. Lam.). Plant Cell Rep. 16 710-4.
2. CAVALCANTE ALVES J. M., Sihachakr D., Allot M., Tizroutine S., Mussio I., Servaes A. and Ducreux G. 1994. Isozyme modifications and plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L. Lam.). Plant Cell Rep. 13 437-41.
3. CHEE R. P. and Cantliffe D. J. 1988. Selective enhancement of Ipomoea batatas Poir. embryogenic and non-embryogenic callus growth and production of embryos in liquid culture. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Culture 15 149-59.
4. CHEE R. P. and Cantliffe D. J. 1989. Embryo development from discrete cell aggregates in lpomoea batatas (L.) Lam. in response to structural polarity. In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 25 757-60.
5. CHEE R. P., Leskovar D. I. and Cantliffe D. J. 1992. Optimizing embryogenic callus and embryo growth of a synthetic seed system for sweet potato by varying media nutrient concentrations. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 117 663-7.
6. DE WALD S. G. and Cantliffe D. J. 1988. Histology of callus initiation and somatic embryogenesis from sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas Poir.). HortScience 23 Sect. 2, 812.
7. DUBOIS M., Gilles K. A., Hamilton J. K., Rebers P. A. and Smith F. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analyt. Chem. 28 350-6.
8. FEDDER N. and O'Brien T. P. 1968. Plant microtechnique: some principles and new methods. Am. J. Bot. 55 123-42.
9. FOWKE L. C. and Rennie P. J. 1995. Plant cell tissue and organ culture, fundamental methods. pp 217-28. Edited by O. L. Gamborg and G. C. Phillips. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg
10. JARRET R. L., Salazar S. and Fernandez Z. R. 1984. Somatic embryogenesis in sweet potato. Hortscience 19 397-8.
11. LOWRY O. H., Rosebrough N. J., Farr A. L. and Randall R. J. 1951. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. biol. Chem. 193 265-75.
12. MASCARENHAS A. F. 1981. Plant tissue culture: its role in studies on organogenesis. Curr. Sci. 50 835-40.
13. MUKHERJEE A., Unnikrishnan M. and Nair N. G. 1991. Callus induction, embryogenesis and regeneration from sweet potato anther. J. Root Crops Nat. Symp. 17 302-4.
14. MUKHERJEE A., Debata B. K. and Naskar S. K. 1998a. Somatic embryogenesis and chromosomal stability of regenerants in sweet potato and taro. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 57 709-15.
15. MUKHERJEE A., Debata B. K. and Naskar S. K. 1998b. Cytology of callus and regenerated plants of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L). Cytobios 96 109-18.
16. MURASHIGE T. and Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant. 15 473-97.
17. NELSON N. 1944. A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi's method for the determination of glucose. J. biol. Chem. 153 375-80.
18. PADMANABHAN K., Cantliffe D. J. and Koch K. E. 1996. Auxin-but not sugar-responsive expression is altered with competence in callus cultures of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L. Lam.) of different age. Plant Physiol. 111 Suppl. 142.
19. PADMANABHAN K., Cantliffe D. J., Harrell R. C. and Harrison J. 1998a. Computer vision analysis of somatic embryos of sweet potato lpomoea batatas (L) Lam. for assessing their ability to convert to plants. Plant Cell Rep. 17 681-4.
20. PADMANABHAN K., Cantliffe D. J., Harrell R. C. and McConnell D. B. 1998b. A comparison of shoot-forming and non-shoot-forming somatic embryos of sweet potato Ipomoea batatas (L) Lam. using computer vision and histological analyses. Plant Cell Rep. 17 685-92.
21. RAEMAKERS C. J. J. M., Jacobsen E. and Visser R. G. F. 1994. Working document. Number 150, Vol I, pp 336-45. Proc. Second Int. Scientific Meeting of Cassava Biotechnology. Net Work (CBN), CIAT, Colombia.
22. SCHULTHEIS J. R. and Cantliffe D. J. 1988. Plant formation of Ipomoea batatas Poir. from somatic embryos in gel carriers with additives. HortScience 23 812.
23. SCHULTHEIS J. R. and Cantliffe D. J. 1992. Growth of somatic embryos of sweet potato Ipomoea batatas (L) Lam. in hydroxyethyl cellulose gel amended with salts and carbohydrates. Sci. Hortic. 50 21-33.
24. SMITH S. M. and Street H. E. 1974. The decline of embryogenic potential as callus and suspension cultures of carrot (Dacus carota L.) are serially subcultured. Ann. Bot. 38 223-41.
25. VASIL V. and Vasil I. K. 1984. Preparation of cultured tissues for scanning electron microscopy. In Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants. Vol I,. pp 738-43. Edited by I. K. Vasil. Academic Press, New York, U.S.A.
26. WETHERELL D. F. 1978. In vitro embryoid formation in callus derived from somatic plant tissues. In Propagation of Higher Plants through Tissue Culture, pp 102-24. Edited by Huges, Henke and Constantin, Technical Information Center, Dept. of Energy, U.S.A.
27. ZHENG Q., PoroboDessai A. and Prakash C. S. 1996. Rapid and repetitive plant regeneration in sweet potato via somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Rep. 15 381-5.