Survey of use of ST-segment monitoring in patients with acute coronary syndromes

American Journal of Critical Care

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 23-34

  Patton, Jae A ^a   Funk, Marjorie ^b  

^a NATIONAL HEART LUNG AND BLOOD INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE DISEASE; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY CARE UNIT; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; STANDARD; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ACUTE DISEASE; CARDIAC CARE FACILITIES; CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CORONARY DISEASE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0035228418     PISSN: 10623264     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2001.10.1.23     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Drew BJ, Krucoff MW for the ST-Segment Monitoring Practice Guideline International Working Group. Multilead ST-segment monitoring in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a consensus statement for healthcare professionals. Am J Crit Care. 1999;8:372-388.
2. Gottlieb SO, Weisfeldt ML, Ouyang P, Mellits ED, Gerstenblith G. Silent ischemia as a marker for early unfavorable outcomes in patients with unstable angina. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1214-1219.
3. Langer A, Freeman MR, Armstrong PW. ST segment shift in unstable angina: pathophysiology and association with coronary anatomy and hospital outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;13:1495-1502.
4. Larsson H, Jonasson T, Ringqvist I, Fellenius C, Wallentin L. Diagnostic and prognostic importance of ST recording after an episode of unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1992;13:207-212.
5. Kwon K, Freedman B, Wilcox I, et al. The unstable ST segment early after thrombolysis for acute infarction and its usefulness as a marker of recurrent coronary occlusion. Am J Cardiol. 1991;67:109-115.
6. Bush HS, Ferguson JJ, Angelini P, Willerson JT. Twelve-lead electrocardiographic evaluation of ischemia during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and its correlation with acute reocclusion. Am Heart J. 1991;121:1591-1599.
7. Krucoff MW, Parente AR, Bottner RK, et al. Stability of multilead ST-segment "fingerprints" over time after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and its usefulness in detecting reocclusion. Am J Cardiol. 1988;61:1232-1237.
8. Santoro GM, Valenti R, Buonamici P, et al. Relation between ST-segment changes and myocardial perfusion evaluated by myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with direct angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:932-937.
9. Dellborg M, Steg PG, Simoons M, et al. Vectorcardiographic monitoring to assess early vessel patency after reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1995;16:21-29.
10. Fernandez AR, Sequeira RF, Chakko S, et al. ST segment tracking for rapid determination of patency of the infarct-related artery in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:675-683.
11. Krucoff MW, Green CE, Satler LF, et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary artery patency using continuous ST-segment monitoring. Am J Cardiol. 1986;57:916-922.
12. Strauss A, Corbin J. Grounded theory methodology: an overview. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1994:273-285.
13. Drew BJ, Tisdale LA. ST-segment monitoring for coronary artery reocclusion following thrombolytic therapy and coronary angioplasty: identification of optimal bedside monitoring leads. Am J Crit Care. 1993;2:280-292.
14. Drew BJ, Koops RR, Adams MG, Dower GE. The derived 12-lead electrocardiogram: comparison with the standard electrocardiogram during myocardial ischemia and its potential application for continuous ST-segment monitoring. J Electrocardiol. 1994;27:242-248.
15. Drew BJ, Ide B, Sparacino PSA. Accuracy of bedside electrocardiographic monitoring: a report on current practices of critical care nurses. Heart Lung. 1991;20:597-608.
16. Drew BJ, Pelter MM, Adams MG, Wung SF, Chou TM, Wolfe CL. 12-Lead ST-segment monitoring vs single-lead maximum ST-segment monitoring for detecting ongoing ischemia in patients with unstable coronary syndromes. Am J Crit Care. 1998;7:355-363.
17. Drew BJ, Adams MG, Pelter MM, Wung SF. ST-segment monitoring with a derived 12-lead electrocardiogram is superior to routine cardiac care unit monitoring. Am J Crit Care. 1996;5:198-205.
18. Drew BJ, Adams MG, Pelter MM, Wung SF, Caldwell MA. Comparison of standard and derived 12-lead electrocardiograms for diagnosis of coronary angioplasty-induced myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:639-644.
19. Cooper MC. The intersection of technology and care in the ICU. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. March 1993;15:23-32.
20. Bell NN. Clinical significance of ST-segment monitoring. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 1992;4:312-323.
21. Drew BJ, Wung SF, Adams MG, Pelter MM. Bedside diagnosis of myocardial ischemia with ST-segment monitoring technology: measurement issues for real-time clinical decision making and trial designs. J Electrocardiol. 1998;30(suppl):157-165.
22. Graf C, Drew BJ. Continuous ST-segment monitoring: how it works. Am J Nurs. November 1993;93(suppl):18-22.