The experience of clinician-researchers in occupational therapy

American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 9-18

  Cusick, Anne ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Allied health personnel; Hospitals, special; Research

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MANPOWER; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RESEARCH; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RESEARCH;

EID: 0035227971     PISSN: 02729490     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5014/ajot.55.1.9     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. American Occupational Therapy Foundation, Inc. (1979). Research in occupational therapy...It's everybody's responsibility!!! American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 33, 666-667.
2. American Occupational Therapy Foundation, Inc. (1983). Research competencies for clinicians and educators. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 37, 44-46.
3. American Occupational Therapy Foundation, Inc. (1995). Research grant policies and current research funding priorities of the American Occupational Therapy Foundation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 835-836.
4. Babbie, E. R. (1986). The practice of social research (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
5. Bailes, A. M., & Baldwin, C. (1995). Research in pediatric physical and occupational therapy settings. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 14, 75-93.
6. Baldwin, J. D. (1986). George Herbert Mead: A unifying theory for sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Ballantyne, B., & Ross, N. (1992). Departmental initiative: Setting up a research feasibility study. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 39, 39-40.
8. Barlow, D. H., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1984). The scientist-practitioner: Research and accountability in clinical and educational settings. New York: Pergamon.
9. Basmajian, J. V. (1975). Research or retrench: The rehabilitation professions challenged. Physical Therapy, 55, 607-610.
10. Bazeley, P., Kemp, L., Stevens, K., Asmar, C., Grbich, C., Marsh, H., & Bhathal, R. (1996). Waiting in the wings: A study of early career academic researchers in Australia. (National Board of Employment, Education and Training Commissioned Report No. 50, Australian Research Council). Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Printing Service.
11. Bhathal, R. S. (1996). Australian astronomers: Achievements at the frontiers of astronomy. Canberra, Australia: National Library of Australia.
12. Bhathal, R. S. (1999). Profiles: Australian women scientists. Canberra, Australia: National Library of Australia.
13. Bland, C. J., & Ruffin, M. T. (1992). Characteristics of a productive research environment: Literature review. Academic Medicine, 67, 385-397.
14. Bland, C. J., & Schmitz, C. C. (1986). Characteristics of the successful researcher and implications for faculty development. Journal of Medical Education, 61, 22-31.
15. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. Bohannon, R. W., & Le Veau, B. F. (1986). Clinician's use of research findings: A review of literature with implications for physical therapists. Physical Therapy, 66, 45-50.
17. Bond, E. C. (1991). The need for policy-relevant research and the role of allied health researchers. Journal of Allied Health, 20, 199-128.
18. Boyle, M. A., Dunn, W., & Kielhofner, G. (1990). Funding for research and training in professional occupational therapy education programs from 1985 to 1987. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 10, 334-342.
19. Brown, G. T., & Rodger, S. (1999). Research utilization models: Frameworks for implementing evidence based occupational therapy practice. Occupational Therapy International, 6, 1-23.
20. Christiansen, C. H. (1983). Editorial - Research: An economic imperative. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 3, 195-198.
21. Clark, F. A. (1986). The Foundation - A new concept: Apprenticeships for occupational therapy researchers. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 639-641.
22. Cohen, J. (1989). About steaks liking to be eaten: The conflicting views of symbolic interaction and Talcott Parsons concerning the nature of relations between persons and non-human subjects. Symbolic Interaction, 12, 191-213.
23. Colborn, A. P. (1993). Combining practice and research. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 693-703.
24. Collins, R. (1985). Three sociological traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Conway, M. E. (1988). Theoretical approaches to the study of roles. In M. E. Hardy & M. E. Conway (Eds.), Role theory: Perspectives for health professionals (2nd ed., pp. 63-72). Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
26. Creswell, J. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Cusick, A. (1995). Australian occupational therapy research: A review of publications 1987-91. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 42, 67-75.
28. Cusick (2000). Practitioner-researchers in occupational therapy. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 47, 11-27.
29. Cusick, A. (in press). The research sensitive practitioner. In J. Higgs & A. Titchen (Eds.), Professional practice in health, education and the creative arts. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.
30. Cusick, A., Franklin, A., & Rotem, A. (1999). Meanings of "research" and "researcher" - The clinician perspective. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 19, 101-125.
31. Cusick, A., & Rotem, A. (1994). Definitions of research by occupational therapy clinicians: An exploratory study. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 41, 99-114.
32. Denzin, N. K. (Ed). (1997). Studies in symbolic interactionism (Vol. 21). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
33. DePoy, E., & Gallagher, C. (1990). Steps in collaborative research between clinicians and faculty. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44, 55-59.
34. DePoy, E., & Gitlin, L. N. (1998). Introduction to research: Understanding and applying multiple strategies. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
35. Dunn, W. (1985). Occupational therapy's challenge: Care giving and research. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 39, 259-264.
36. Fisher, A. G., Kielhofner, G., & Davis, C. (1989). Research values of occupational and physical therapists. Journal of Allied Health, 18, 143-145.
37. Gilfoyle, E. M., & Christiansen, C. H. (1987). Nationally Speaking - Research: The quest for truth and the key to excellence. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41, 7-8.
38. Gillette, N. P. (1982). Nationally Speaking - A data base for occupational therapy: Documentation through research. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36, 499-501.
39. Gillette, N. P., & Mitcham, M. D. (1994). The Issue Is - Is it not always time for new research ideas? American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 649-650.
40. Glaser, B. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12, 436-445.
41. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
42. Graham, J., & Irvine, R. (1994). Deconstructing the concept of profession: A pre-requisite to carving a niche in a changing world. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 41, 9-18.
43. Greenblatt, M. (1971). Research. In M. Greenblatt, M. R. Sharaf, & E. M. Stone (Eds.), Dynamics of institutional change (pp. 205-237). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
44. Greenwood, J. (1984). Nursing research: A position paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 9, 77-82.
45. Harrison, M. A. (1996). Evidence-based practice - Practice-based evidence. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 12, 129-130.
46. Hardy, M. E. (1988). Perspectives on science. In M. E. Hardy & M. E. Conway (Eds.), Role theory: Perspectives for health professionals (2nd ed., pp. 1-28). Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
47. Hathaway, E. (1974). Research in occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41, 65-68.
48. Holloway, I. (1997). Basic concepts for qualitative research. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.
49. Hunt, J. (1981). Indicators for nursing practice: The use of research findings. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 6, 189-194.
50. Hunter, J. E. (1976). Research and occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 43, 121-125.
51. Hurley-Wilson, B. A. (1988). Socialization for roles. In E. Hardy & M. E. Conway (Eds.), Role theory: Perspectives for health professionals (2nd ed., pp. 73-110). Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
52. Jacob, E. (1987). Qualitative research traditions: A review. Review of Educational Research, 57, 1-50.
53. Jorgensen, D. L. (1989). Participant observation: A methodology for human studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54. Kirchoff, K. T. (1993). The role of nurse researchers employed in clinical settings. Annual Review of Nursing Research, 11, 169-181.
55. Krefting, L. H. (1985). The use of conceptual models in clinical practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 173-178.
56. Le Compte, J. D., & Preissle, J. (with Tesh, R.). (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
57. Le Roux, A. A. (1988). Physiotherapy research: A personal view. Physiotherapy, 74, 152-154.
58. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
60. Miller, D. I. (1981). The meaning of role taking. Symbolic Interaction, 4, 167.
61. Ottenbacher, K. J. (1987). Nationally Speaking - Research: Its importance to clinical practice in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41, 213-215.
62. Ottenbacher, K. J., Barris, R., & Van Deusen, J. (1986). Some issues related to research utilization in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 111-116.
63. Pavalko, R. M. (1971). The occupation-profession continuum: A conceptual model. In R. M. Pavalko (Ed.), Sociology of occupations and professions (pp. 15-43). Itaska, IL: F. E. Peacock.
64. Pelz, D. C., & Andrews, F. M. (1976). Scientists in organizations' productive climates for research and development (Rev. ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
65. Polatajko, H., & MacKinnon, J. (1987). Occupational therapy graduate education: The scientist-practitioner model. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 119-138.
66. Rogers, J. C., & Holm, M. B. (1994). Nationally Speaking -Accepting the challenge of outcome research: Examining the effectiveness of occupational therapy practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 871-876.
67. Rose, A. M. (1962). A systematic summary of symbolic interaction theory. In A. M. Rose (Ed.), Human behavior and social processes (pp. 3-19). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
68. Royeen, C. B. (1988). Philosophy and methodologies of research tradition in occupational therapy: Process, philosophy and status. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
69. Schatzman, L., & Strauss, A. (1973). Field research: Strategies for a natural sociology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
70. Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
71. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
72. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
73. Stryker, S. (1981). Symbolic interactionism: Themes and variations. In M. Rosenberg & R. H. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 3-29). New York: Basic.
74. Taylor, E., & Mitchell, M. (1990). Research attitudes and activities of occupational therapy clinicians. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44, 350-355.
75. Thomas, E. J., & Biddle, B. J. (1966). The nature and history of role theory. In B. J. Biddle & E. J. Thomas (Eds.), Role theory: Concepts and research (pp. 3-19). New York: Wiley.
76. Turner, R. H. (1962). Role taking: Process versus conformity. In A. Rose (Ed.), Human behavior and social processes (pp. 20-40). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
77. Vidich, A. J., & Lyman, S. M. (1994). Qualitative methods: Their history in sociology and anthropology. In W. K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 23-59). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
78. Waine, M., Magill-Evans, J., & Pain, K. (1997). Alberta occupational therapists' perspectives on and participation in research. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 82-88.
79. Wallis, M. A. (1987a). "Profession" and "professionalism" and the emerging profession of occupational therapy: Part 1. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 264-265.
80. Wallis, M. A. (1987b). "Profession" and "professionalism" and the emerging profession of occupational therapy: Part 2. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 300-302.
81. West, W. (1981). Commentary - A journal of research in occupational therapy: The response, the responsibility. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 1, 7-12.
82. Yerxa, E. J. (1987). Nationally Speaking - Research: The key to the development of occupational therapy as an academic discipline. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41, 415-419.
83. Yerxa, E., & Gilfoyle, E. (1976). American Occupational Therapy Foundation, Inc. - Research seminar. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 30, 509-514.