Population parameters to compare dog breeds: Differences between five dutch purebred populations

Veterinary Quarterly

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 43-49

  Nielen, A L J ^a   Ubbink, G J ^a,d   Knol, B W ^a   van der Beek, S ^b,c  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c Nederlands Rundvee Syndicaat ^*  (Netherlands)

^d NONE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BREEDING; CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; DOG; DOG DISEASE; FEMALE; GENETIC DISORDER; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; INBREEDING; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PEDIGREE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COHORT STUDIES; DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY; DOG DISEASES; DOGS; FEMALE; GENETIC DISEASES, INBORN; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; INBREEDING; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PEDIGREE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 0035227394     PISSN: 01652176     EISSN: 18755941     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01652176.2001.9695075     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Buchanan JW. Causes and prevalence of cardiovascular disease. Current Veterinary Therapy Saunders. Philadelphia; 1992:647–55.
2. Caballero A. Developments in the prediction of effective population size. Heredity 1994; 73 (6); 657–79.
3. Falconer DS, and MacKay TFC. Introduction to Quantitative genetics. Longman Group LTD, Harlow, 1996: 66–8.
4. Haggstrom J. Chronic valvular disease in the cavalier King Charles spaniel in Sweden. Vet Rcc 1992; 131:549–53.
5. Kienle RD, Thomas WP, and Pion PD. The natural clinical history of canine congenital subaortic stenosis. J Vet Intern Med 1994; 8 (6): 42331.
6. Mandigers PJ, Nes JJ van, Knol BW, Ubbink GJ, and Grays E. Hereditary necrotising myelopathy in Kooikerdogs. Res Vet Set 1993, 54(1): 118–23.
7. Miglior F, Szkotnicki A, and Burnside EB. Analysis of levels of inbreeding and inbreeding depression in Jcrsy catle. J Dairy Sci 1992; 75: I I12-8
8. Nicholas FW. Introduction to Veterinary Genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1996:236.
9. Nielcn ALJ, Gaag I van der, Knol BW, and Schukken YH. An investigation of mortality and pathological findings in a birth cohort of boxer puppies. Vet Rcc 1998; 142:602–6.
10. Patterson DF. Research on genetic diseases: Reciprocal benefits to ammalsandman. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1988; 193:1131-44
11. Patterson DF. Understanding and controlling inherited diseases in dogs and cats. Tijdschr Dicrgeneeskd 1993; 118 suppl 1:23S-27S.
12. Rchfcld CE. Definition of relationships in a closed Beagle colony. Am J Vet Res 1970; 31:723–32.
13. Swenson L, Audell L, and Hedhammar A. Prevalence, inheritance and selection for elbow arthrosis in Bemes Mountain dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997;210:215-20
14. Ubbink GJ. Some aspects of breedassociatcd canine disease in the Netherlands. Dissertation University Utrecht 1998:12-25
15. Ubbink GJ, Knol BW, and Bouw J. The relationship between homozygosity and the occurrence of specific diseases in Bouvier Beige des Flandres dogs in the Netherlands. Vet Q tiart 1992; 14(4): 137–40.
16. Ubbink GJ, VandcnBroek J. Hazewinkel HAW, and Rothuizen J. Cluster analysis of the genetic heterogeneity and disease distributions in purebred dog populations. Vet Rcc 1998:142:209–13.
17. Ubbink GJ, Van den Broek J, Hazewinkel HAW, and Rothuizen J. Fractured coronoid process and elbow incongruity in Dutch bemese mountain dogs. Dissertation University Utrecht 1998: 81–96.
18. Willis MB. Genetics of the dog. ILF. & G. Witherby Ltd., London 1989;328.
19. Wright S. Coefficient of inbreeding and relationship. Am Nat 1922; 56: 330–9.