Interzonal microtubules and meiotic restitution in the dycots

Tsitologiya

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 37-38

  Shamina, N V ^a   Vaisman, N Ya ^a   Dorogova, N V ^a   Shavorskaya, O A ^a   Maletskiy, S I ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF CYTOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CYTOLOGY; GOOSEFOOT; MEIOSIS; MICROTUBULE; MUTATION; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

CHENOPODIACEAE; MEIOSIS; MICROTUBULES; MUTATION;

EID: 0035227214     PISSN: 00413771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Alfano F., Errico A., Conicella C. 1997. Potato meiotic mutants and importance of changes in the cytoskeleton. Cell Biol. Internat. 21 : 3-5.
2. Lam S. L. 1974. Origin and formation of unerduced gametes in the potato. J. Heredity. 65 : 175-178.
3. Lambert A.-M., Lloyd C. W. 1994. In: The higher plant mic-rotubule cycle. Microtubules. New York: Wiley-Liss, Inc. 325-341.
4. Lloyd C. 1994. Why should stationary plant cell have such dynamic microtubules? Mol. Biol. Cell. 5 : 1277-1280.
5. Mok D. W. S., Peloquin S. J. 1975. Three mechanisms of 2n pollen formation in diploid potatoes. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 17 : 217-225.
6. Traas J. A., Burgain S., Dumas De Vaulx R. 1989. The organization of the cytoskeleton during meiosis in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.): microtubules and F actin are both necessary for coordinated meiotic division. J. Cell Sci. 92 : 541-550.
7. Ramanna M. S. 1979. A re-examination of mechanisms of 2n-gamet formation in potato and its implications for breeding. Euphytica. 28 : 537-561.
8. Van Lameren A. A. M., Keijzer C. J., Willemse M. T. M., Kieft H. 1985. Structure and function of the microtubular cytoskeleton during pollen development in Gasteria verrucosa (Mill.) H. Duval. Planta. 165 : 1-11.
9. Wada B., Kusunoki F. 1964. Spindle membrane in meiosis of pollen mother cells of Tradescantia and in mitosis of endosperm cells of Zephyranthes. Cytologia (Tokyo). 29 : 109-117.