|
Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 21-24
|
Comparison of blood, bone marrow aspirate, stool and urine cultures in the diagnosis of enteric fever.
a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
BLOOD;
BONE MARROW;
BONE MARROW EXAMINATION;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DEVELOPING COUNTRY;
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS;
FECES;
HUMAN;
ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION;
MALARIA;
METABOLISM;
MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION;
MICROBIOLOGY;
NIGERIA;
PARASITOLOGY;
PREVALENCE;
SALMONELLA PARATYPHI;
SALMONELLA TYPHI;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SEROLOGY;
SEROTYPING;
STANDARD;
TYPHOID FEVER;
UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;
URINE;
VALIDATION STUDY;
BACTERIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES;
BLOOD;
BONE MARROW;
BONE MARROW EXAMINATION;
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES;
DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL;
FECES;
HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY;
HUMANS;
MALARIA;
NIGERIA;
PREVALENCE;
SALMONELLA PARATYPHI A;
SALMONELLA TYPHI;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SEROLOGIC TESTS;
SEROTYPING;
TYPHOID FEVER;
URINE;
|
EID: 0035226267
PISSN: 11152613
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (8)
|
References (0)
|