|
Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 57-60
|
Nonresorbable versus resorbable sutures in oral implant surgery: a prospective clinical study.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
NYLON;
POLYGLACTIN;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT;
CHEMISTRY;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DENTAL SURGERY;
DENTURE;
EDENTULOUSNESS;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
HUMAN;
INCIDENCE;
INSTRUMENTATION;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PLASTIC SURGERY;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SUTURE;
SUTURING METHOD;
TOOTH IMPLANTATION;
TOOTH PROSTHESIS;
WOUND DEHISCENCE;
ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
DENTAL ABUTMENTS;
DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS;
DENTAL IMPLANTS;
DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH;
DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN;
DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HUMANS;
INCIDENCE;
JAW, EDENTULOUS;
JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
NYLONS;
POLYGLACTIN 910;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
SURGICAL FLAPS;
SURGICAL WOUND DEHISCENCE;
SUTURE TECHNIQUES;
SUTURES;
|
EID: 0035222877
PISSN: 15230899
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00129.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (18)
|
References (0)
|