Feature localization and identification

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 106, Issue 1-2, 2001, Pages 97-119

  Donk, Mieke ^a,b   Meinecke, Cristina ^c  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Binominal models; Identification; Localization; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; VISION;

FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0035222136     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00028-7     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ashby, F. G., & Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154-179.
2. Atkinson, J., & Braddick, O. (1989). Where and what in visual search. Perception, 18, 181-189.
3. Banks, M. S., Sekuler, A. B., & Anderson, S. J. (1991). Peripheral spatial vision: Limits imposed by optics, photoreceptors, and receptor pooling. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 8, 1775-1787.
4. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1986). The statistical analysis of a model for storage and retrieval processes in human memory. British Journal of Mathematical and statistical Psychology, 39, 129-149.
5. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing model of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
6. Cave, K. R., & Wolfe, J. M. (1990). Modelling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 225-271.
7. Donk, M. (1999). Illusory conjunctions are an illusion: The effects of target-nontarget similarity on conjunction and feature errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1207-1233.
8. Folk, C. L., & Egeth, H. (1989). Does the identification of simple features require serial processing?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 97-110.
9. Geisler, W. S., & Chou, K.-L. (1995). Separation of low-level and high-level factors in complex tasks: Visual search. Psychological Review, 102, 356-378.
10. Green, M. (1991). Visual search, visual streams and visual architectures. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 388-403.
11. Green, M. (1992). Visual Search: Detection, identification and localization. Perception, 21, 765-777.
12. Hu, X., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59, 21-47.
13. Joffe, K. M., & Scialfa, C. T. (1995). Texture segmentation as a function of retinal eccentricity, spatial frequency and target size. Spatial Vision, 9, 325-342.
14. Johnston, J. C., & Pashler, H. (1990). Close binding of identity and location in visual feature perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 16, 843-856.
15. Kehrer, L. (1987). Perceptual segregation and retinal position. Spatial Vision, 2, 247-261.
16. Kehrer, L. (1989). Central performance drop on perceptual segregation tasks. Spatial Vision, 4, 45-62.
17. Link, S. W. (1982). Correcting response measures for guessing and partial information. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 469-486.
18. Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
19. Meinecke, C. (1989). Retinal eccentricity and the detection of targets. Psychological Research, 51, 107-116.
20. Meinecke, C., & Kehrer, L. (1994). Peripheral and foveal segmentation of angle textures. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 326-334.
21. Nothdurft, H. C. (1985). Sensitivity for structure gradient in texture discrimination tasks. Vision Research, 25, 1957-1968.
22. Nothdurft, H. C. (1990). Texton segregation by associated differences in global and local luminance distribution. Proceedings of the Royal society of London B, 239, 295-320.
23. Nothdurft, H. C. (1992). Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 255-275.
24. Riefer, D. M., & Batchelder, W. H. (1988). Multinomial modelling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95, 318-339.
25. Saarinen, J. (1996a). Target localisation and identification in rapid visual search. Perception, 25, 305-311.
26. Saarinen, J. (1996b). Localization and discrimination of pop-out targets. Vision Research, 36, 313-316.
27. Sagi, D., & Julesz, B. (1985a). Where and what in vision. Science, 228, 1217-1219.
28. Sagi, D., & Julesz, B. (1985b). Detection versus discrimination of visual orientation. Perception, 14, 619-628.
29. Sagi, D., & Julesz, B. (1987). Short-range limitation on detection of feature differences. Spatial Vision, 2, 39-49.
30. Sanders, A. F. (1980). Stage analysis of reaction processes. In G.E. Stelmach & J. Requin, Tutorials in motor behavior. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
31. Sanders, A. F. (1990). Issues and trends in the debate on discrete vs continuous processing of information. Acta Psychologica, 74, 123-167.
32. Sanders, A. F. (1998). Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Schneider, W. X. (1995). VAM: a neuro-cognitive model for visual attention control of segmentation, object recognition and space-based motor action. Visual Cognition, 2, 331-375.
34. Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences, second edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Townsend, J. T. (1974). Issues and models concerning the processing of finite number of inputs. In B. H. Kantowitz, Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 133-168). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Townsend, J. T. (1990). Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychological Science, 1, 46-54.
37. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A Feature-Integration Theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
38. Treisman, A. M., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological review, 95, 15-48.
39. Treisman, A. M., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459-478.
40. Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141.
41. Ungeleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. Mansfield, Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-580). Cambridge: MIT Press.
42. VanDuren, L. L., & Sanders, A. F. (1988). On the robustness of the additive factors stage structure in blocked and mixed choice reaction designs. Acta Psychologica, 69, 83-94.
43. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0. A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
44. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided Search: An alternative to the Feature Integration Model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419-433.