'The dog that didn't bark': Taking class seriously in the health inequalities debate

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 157-159

  Scambler, Graham ^a   Higgs, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOG; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH STATUS; NOTE; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL MEDICINE;

FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; RESEARCH DESIGN; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIOLOGY, MEDICAL;

EID: 0035219033     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00292-6     Document Type: Note

References (19)

1. Income inequality, social cohesion and the health status of populations: The role of neo-liberalism
2. A brief response
3. Risk, governmentality and the reconceptualization of citizenship
4. Post-fordism and the state
5. Income inequality and mortality in metropolitan areas of the United States
6. Income inequality, social cohesion, and class relations: A critique of Wilkinson's neo-Durkheimian research programme
7. Stratification, class and health: Class relations and health inequalities in high modernity
8. Class, power and the durability of health inequalities
9. A new paradigm for nursing: The potential of realism
10. Managed openness: Beyond neoliberal globalism
11. Is anybody there? Critical realism, chronic illness and the disability debate