Dishonesty in academic environments: The influence of peer reporting requirements

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 29-45

  McCabe, Donald L ^a   Trevino, Linda Klebe ^a   Butterfield, Kenneth D ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035218301     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2001.11778863     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Baird, J. S. (1980). Current trends in college cheating. Psychology in the Schools. 17, 515-522.
2. Bowers, W. J. (1964). Student dishonesty and its control in college. New York: Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.
3. Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Feldman, D. C. (1984). The development and reinforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9, 47-53.
5. Graham, J. W. (1986). Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 1-52.
6. Greenberg, D. B., Miceli, M. P., & Cohen, D. J. (1987). Oppositionists and group norms: The reciprocal influence of whistle-blowers and co-workers. Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 527-542.
7. Haines, V. J., Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., & Clark, R. E. (1986). College cheating: Immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education, 25, 342-354.
8. Hogan, R., & Emler, N. P. (1981). Retributive justice. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 125-143). New York: Plenum Press.
9. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: John Wiley.
10. Luthans, F., & Kreitner, R. (1985). Organizational behavior modification and beyond. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
11. McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 522-538.
12. McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multi-campus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38, 379-396.
13. McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (1999). Academic integrity in honor code and non-honor code environments: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Higher Education, 70, 211-234.
14. Melendez, B. (1985). Honor code study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
15. Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (1984). The relationship among beliefs, organizational position, and whistle-blowing status: A discriminant analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 687-705.
16. Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., & Schwenk, C. R. (1989). Individual and organizational predictors of whistleblowing. Working Paper Series, 89-4, College of Business, The Ohio State University.
17. Miethe, T. D., & Rothschild, J. (1994). Whistleblowing and the control of organizational misconduct. Sociological Inquiry, 64, 322-347.
18. Nuss, E. M. (1984). Academic integrity: Comparing faculty and student attitudes. Improving College and University Teaching, 32, 140-144.
19. Piliavin, I.,Thornton, C., Gartner, R., & Matsueda, R. (1986). Crime, deterrence, and rational choice. American Sociological Review, 47, 489-504.
20. Shaw, M. E. (1971). Group dynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21. Singhal, A. C. (1982). Factors in students' dishonesty. Psychological Reports, 51, 775-780.
22. Stern, E. B., & Havlicek, L. (1986). Academic misconduct: Results of faculty and undergraduate student surveys. Journal of Allied Health, 5, 129-142.
23. Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D. R. (1980). Principles of criminology (8th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
24. Trevino, L. K. (1992). The social effects of punishment in organizations: A justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 17, 647-676.
25. Trevino, L. K., & Victor, B. (1991). Peer reporting of unethical behavior: A social context perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 38-64.
26. Tittle, C. R., & Rowe, A. R. (1973). Moral appeal, sanction threat, and deviance: An experimental test. Social Problems, 20, 488-497.