The rise of the regulatory state in Britain

Parliamentary Affairs

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 19-34

  Moran, Michael ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035217344     PISSN: 00312290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/pa/54.1.19     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. 1 The most important recent studies include: G. Majone, Regulating Europe, Routledge, 1996; T. Prosser, Law and the Regulators, Clarendon Press, 1997; M. Power, The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford UP, 1997; R. Baldwin and M. Cave, Understanding Regulation: Theory, Stragegy and Practice, Oxford UP, 1999; C. Hood, C. Scott, O. James, G. Jones and T. Travers, Regulation inside Government: Waste-Watchers, Quality Police and Sleaze-Busters, Oxford UP, 1999; C. Hall, C. Scott and C. Hood, Telecommunications Regulation: Culture, Chaos and Interdependence inside the Regulatory Process, Routledge, 2000; M. Clarke, Regulation: The Social Control of Business between Law and Politics, Macmillan, 2000. The most effective way to keep abreast of the changing institutional structure of regulatory agencies is to follow the links at the main UK government website: http://www.open.gov..uk
2. 1 The most important recent studies include: G. Majone, Regulating Europe, Routledge, 1996; T. Prosser, Law and the Regulators, Clarendon Press, 1997; M. Power, The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford UP, 1997; R. Baldwin and M. Cave, Understanding Regulation: Theory, Stragegy and Practice, Oxford UP, 1999; C. Hood, C. Scott, O. James, G. Jones and T. Travers, Regulation inside Government: Waste-Watchers, Quality Police and Sleaze-Busters, Oxford UP, 1999; C. Hall, C. Scott and C. Hood, Telecommunications Regulation: Culture, Chaos and Interdependence inside the Regulatory Process, Routledge, 2000; M. Clarke, Regulation: The Social Control of Business between Law and Politics, Macmillan, 2000. The most effective way to keep abreast of the changing institutional structure of regulatory agencies is to follow the links at the main UK government website: http://www.open.gov..uk
3. 1 The most important recent studies include: G. Majone, Regulating Europe, Routledge, 1996; T. Prosser, Law and the Regulators, Clarendon Press, 1997; M. Power, The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford UP, 1997; R. Baldwin and M. Cave, Understanding Regulation: Theory, Stragegy and Practice, Oxford UP, 1999; C. Hood, C. Scott, O. James, G. Jones and T. Travers, Regulation inside Government: Waste-Watchers, Quality Police and Sleaze-Busters, Oxford UP, 1999; C. Hall, C. Scott and C. Hood, Telecommunications Regulation: Culture, Chaos and Interdependence inside the Regulatory Process, Routledge, 2000; M. Clarke, Regulation: The Social Control of Business between Law and Politics, Macmillan, 2000. The most effective way to keep abreast of the changing institutional structure of regulatory agencies is to follow the links at the main UK government website: http://www.open.gov..uk
4. 1 The most important recent studies include: G. Majone, Regulating Europe, Routledge, 1996; T. Prosser, Law and the Regulators, Clarendon Press, 1997; M. Power, The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford UP, 1997; R. Baldwin and M. Cave, Understanding Regulation: Theory, Stragegy and Practice, Oxford UP, 1999; C. Hood, C. Scott, O. James, G. Jones and T. Travers, Regulation inside Government: Waste-Watchers, Quality Police and Sleaze-Busters, Oxford UP, 1999; C. Hall, C. Scott and C. Hood, Telecommunications Regulation: Culture, Chaos and Interdependence inside the Regulatory Process, Routledge, 2000; M. Clarke, Regulation: The Social Control of Business between Law and Politics, Macmillan, 2000. The most effective way to keep abreast of the changing institutional structure of regulatory agencies is to follow the links at the main UK government website: http://www.open.gov..uk
5. 1 The most important recent studies include: G. Majone, Regulating Europe, Routledge, 1996; T. Prosser, Law and the Regulators, Clarendon Press, 1997; M. Power, The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford UP, 1997; R. Baldwin and M. Cave, Understanding Regulation: Theory, Stragegy and Practice, Oxford UP, 1999; C. Hood, C. Scott, O. James, G. Jones and T. Travers, Regulation inside Government: Waste-Watchers, Quality Police and Sleaze-Busters, Oxford UP, 1999; C. Hall, C. Scott and C. Hood, Telecommunications Regulation: Culture, Chaos and Interdependence inside the Regulatory Process, Routledge, 2000; M. Clarke, Regulation: The Social Control of Business between Law and Politics, Macmillan, 2000. The most effective way to keep abreast of the changing institutional structure of regulatory agencies is to follow the links at the main UK government website: http://www.open.gov..uk
6. 1 The most important recent studies include: G. Majone, Regulating Europe, Routledge, 1996; T. Prosser, Law and the Regulators, Clarendon Press, 1997; M. Power, The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford UP, 1997; R. Baldwin and M. Cave, Understanding Regulation: Theory, Stragegy and Practice, Oxford UP, 1999; C. Hood, C. Scott, O. James, G. Jones and T. Travers, Regulation inside Government: Waste-Watchers, Quality Police and Sleaze-Busters, Oxford UP, 1999; C. Hall, C. Scott and C. Hood, Telecommunications Regulation: Culture, Chaos and Interdependence inside the Regulatory Process, Routledge, 2000; M. Clarke, Regulation: The Social Control of Business between Law and Politics, Macmillan, 2000. The most effective way to keep abreast of the changing institutional structure of regulatory agencies is to follow the links at the main UK government website: http://www.open.gov..uk
7. 1 The most important recent studies include: G. Majone, Regulating Europe, Routledge, 1996; T. Prosser, Law and the Regulators, Clarendon Press, 1997; M. Power, The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford UP, 1997; R. Baldwin and M. Cave, Understanding Regulation: Theory, Stragegy and Practice, Oxford UP, 1999; C. Hood, C. Scott, O. James, G. Jones and T. Travers, Regulation inside Government: Waste-Watchers, Quality Police and Sleaze-Busters, Oxford UP, 1999; C. Hall, C. Scott and C. Hood, Telecommunications Regulation: Culture, Chaos and Interdependence inside the Regulatory Process, Routledge, 2000; M. Clarke, Regulation: The Social Control of Business between Law and Politics, Macmillan, 2000. The most effective way to keep abreast of the changing institutional structure of regulatory agencies is to follow the links at the main UK government website: http://www.open.gov..uk
8. 2 R.A.W. Rhodes, Understanding Governance, Open UP, 1997.
9. 3 Hall, Scott and Hood, Telecommunications Regulation, pp. 61-81.
10. 4 http://www.foodstandards.gov.uk. Accessed, 18 July 2000.
11. 5 The phrase in quotations is from Hood, Scott, James, Jones and Travers, Regulation Inside Government, p. 3.
12. 6 Ibid., p. 23.
13. 7 Professor Littlechild and his theories are discussed in Prosser, Law and the Regulators, ch. 1.
14. 8 http:/www.sra.gov.uk Accessed, 18 July 2000.
15. 9 Extract from his introduction to the Operational Plan of the Office of the Rail Regulator, 2000-20001, p. 1, accessible at http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk.
16. 10 Majone, Regulating Europe, p. 66.
17. 11 Power, The Audit Society, pp. 1-14; originally coined in his, The Audit Explosion, Demos, 1994.
18. 11 Power, The Audit Society, pp. 1-14; originally coined in his, The Audit Explosion, Demos, 1994.
19. 12 U. Beck, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, trans. M. Ritter, Sage, 1992.
20. 13 The classic study of creative complaince is D. McBarnet and C. Whelan, 'The Elusive Spirit of the Law: Formalism and the Struggle for Legal Control', Modern Law Review 54(6) 1991, 847-73.
21. 14 Majone, Regulating Europe, p. 286.