Study on interaction control for seismic response of parallel structures

Computers and Structures

Volumn 79, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 231-242

  Zhu, Hongping ^a   Wen, Yinping ^a   Iemura, Hirokazu ^b  

^a HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; OPTIMAL CONTROL SYSTEMS; TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS;

SEMI-ACTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; STRUCTURE RESPONSE CONTROL METHOD;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0035215832     PISSN: 00457949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7949(00)00119-X     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Housner GW, Bergman LA, Caughey TK, Chassiakos AG, Clans RO, Masri SF et al. Structural control: past, present and future. J Engng Mech, ASCE 1997;123(9):897-971.
2. Soong T.T., Masri S.F., Housner G.W. An overview of active structural control under seismic loads. Earthquake Spectra. 7(3):1991;483-505.
3. Kobori T. State-of-the-art of seismic response control research in Japan. Proc of U.S. National Workshop on Structural Control Research, 1-21 Oct, Los Angeles, CA, 1990.
4. Soong T.T. Active Structural Control: Theory and Practice. 1990;Longman, London.
5. Soong T.T., Dargush G.F. Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering. 1997;Wiley, New York.
6. Soong T.T., Constantinou M.C. Passive and Active Structural Vibration Control in Civil Engineering. 1994;Springer, Berlin.
7. Agrawal AK, Kosaka H. On optimality and robustness in linear quadratic optimal control of civil engineering structures. Proceedings of the First World Conference on Structural Control, vol. 3. 1994. p. FP1-43-52.
8. Hrovat D., Barak P., Rabins M. Semi-active versus passive or active tuned mass damper for structural control. J Engng Mech, ASCE. 109(3):1983;691-705.
9. Klein RE, Cusano C, Stukel J. Investigation of a method to stabilize wind induced oscillations in large structures. Paper No. 72-WA/AUT-H, Presented at 1972 ASME Winter Annual Meeting, New York, November 1972.
10. Gurley K, Kareem A, Bergman LA, Johnson EA, Klein RE. Coupling tall buildings for control of response to wind. Proc Sixth Int Conf. on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR), AA Balkema Publishers, Rotherdam, 1994. p. 1553-60.
11. Luco JE, Wong HG. Control of the seismic response of adjacent structures. Proc First World Conf on Structural Control, vol. 2, 3-5 August 1994, Los Angeles, CA, TA2-21/TA2-30, 1994.
12. Luco J.E., De Barros F.C.P. Optimal damping between two adjacent elastic structures. Earthquake Engng Struct Dyn. 27:1998;649-659.
13. Feng M.Q., Mita A. Vibration control of tall buildings using mega-subconfiguration. J Engng Mech ASCE. 12(10):1995;1082-1088.
14. Luco J.E., De Barros F.C.P. Control of the seismic response of a composite tall building modelled by two interconnected shear beams. Earthquake Engng Struct Dyn. 27:1998;205-223.
15. Housner GW, Masri SF. Structural control research issues arising out of the Northridge and Kobe earthquakes. Proc of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 2009, 1996.
16. Cremer L., Heckl M. Structure Borne Sound. 1973;Springer, Berlin.
17. Meirovitch L. Dynamics and Control of Structures. 1990;Wiley, New York.
18. Pinnington R.J., Lednik D. Transient energy flow between two coupled beams. J Sound Vibr. 189(2):1996;265-287.