Should all twins be delivered by caesarean section? A preliminary report

Twin Research

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 156-158

  Rydhstroem, H ^a  

^a HELSINGBORG HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; NEWBORN MORTALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TWIN PREGNANCY; TWINS; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; FETAL MONITORING; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; ODDS RATIO; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY, MULTIPLE; REGISTRIES; SWEDEN; TWINS;

EID: 0035209772     PISSN: 13690523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1375/1369052012263     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: A randomised multicentre trial
2. Reliable assessment of the effects of treatment on mortality and major morbidity II: Observational studies
3. Simple interval estimation of risk ratio
4. Further defining the risks confronting twins
5. Prognosis for twins discordant in birth-weight by 1.0 kg or more: The impact of cesarean section
6. Prognosis for twins with a birthweight less than 1 500 g: The impact of cesarean section in relation to fetal presentation
7. A case-control study of the effects of cesarean birth on intrapartum and neonatal mortality in twins weighing 1500-1499 g
8. Lack of correlation between a high caesarean section rate and improved prognosis for low birthweight twins (< 2 500 g)
9. Cerebral palsies: Epidemiology & causal pathways