|
Volumn 12, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 619-625
|
Cost comparison of tinzaparin versus enoxaparin as deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in spinal cord injury: Preliminary data
|
Author keywords
Cost effectiveness; Spinal cord injury; Thromboembolism
|
Indexed keywords
ENOXAPARIN;
TINZAPARIN;
FIBRINOLYTIC AGENT;
HEPARIN, LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT;
LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARIN;
ARTICLE;
COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS;
DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS;
DRUG COST;
DRUG EFFICACY;
DRUG SAFETY;
HUMAN;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROPHYLAXIS;
SPINAL CORD INJURY;
THROMBOEMBOLISM;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
DRUG ADMINISTRATION;
ECONOMICS;
INFORMATION PROCESSING;
LUNG EMBOLISM;
PHARMACOKINETICS;
STANDARD;
VEIN THROMBOSIS;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
DATA COLLECTION;
DRUG ADMINISTRATION SCHEDULE;
ENOXAPARIN;
FIBRINOLYTIC AGENTS;
HEPARIN, LOW-MOLECULAR-WEIGHT;
HUMAN;
PULMONARY EMBOLISM;
SPINAL CORD INJURIES;
THERAPEUTIC EQUIVALENCY;
VENOUS THROMBOSIS;
|
EID: 0035205958
PISSN: 09575235
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/00001721-200112000-00002 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (7)
|
References (63)
|