A fallacy of the multiplicative QALY model for low-quality weights in students and patients judging hypothetical health states

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 488-496

  Stalmeier, Peep F M ^a,b   Chapman, Gretchen B ^c   De Boer, Angela G E M ^a   Van Lanschot, Jan J B ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Health state valuation; Maximum endurable time preferences; Preference reversals; QALYs; Technology assessment

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER SURVIVAL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ESOPHAGUS CANCER; ESOPHAGUS RESECTION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MALE; MIGRAINE; MODEL; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR;

ADULT; AGED; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGECTOMY; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MIGRAINE DISORDERS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NETHERLANDS; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; SELF EFFICACY;

EID: 0035197195     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S026646230110704X     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon
2. Response-induced reversals of preferences in gambling: An extended replication in Las Vegas
3. Inconsistent preferences among gambles
4. Valuing health status using VAS and TTO: What lies behind the numbers?
5. Proportional heuristics in time trade off and conjoint measurement
6. Preference reversals: Violations of unidimensional procedure invariance
7. Attitudes toward quality of survival: The concept of "maximum endurable time"
8. A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs
9. The causes of preference reversal
10. Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practices