Systematic eye movements do not account for the perception of motion during attentive tracking

Vision Research

Volumn 41, Issue 25-26, 2001, Pages 3505-3511

  Verstraten, Frans A J ^a   Hooge, Ignace T C ^a   Culham, Jody ^b   Van Wezel, Richard J A ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attentive tracking; Consciousness; Efference copy; Perceived motion; Systematic eye movements

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONSCIOUSNESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; EYE TRACKING; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA IMAGE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION;

EID: 0035189041     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00205-X     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Short-range vs. long-range motion: Not a valid distinction
2. Attention-based motion perception
3. Precise recording of human eye movements
4. Higher order motion aftereffects
5. Independent aftereffects of attention and motion
6. Perceived head-centric speed is affected by both extra-retinal and retinal errors
7. False perception of motion in a patient who cannot compensate for eye movements
8. Attention-generated motion perception
9. Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of premotor theory of attention
10. A method of measuring eye movement using a scleral search coil in a magnetic field
11. A systems analysis of visual motion processing
12. Nonlinear contribution of eye velocity to motion perception
13. Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention
14. Relations between the central nervous system and the peripheral organs
15. Motion perception during self-motion: The direct versus inferential controversy revisited
16. Experimentelle studien über das sehen von bewegung
17. Experimental studies on the seeing of motion