Commentary on Drs Patz, Black, and Goodman's viewpoint

Radiology

Volumn 221, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 598-599

  Miettinen, O S ^a   Henschke, C I ^a  

^a NY Pres Hosp Weill Cor Med Ctr   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography (CT), utilization; Lung neoplasms, CT; Lung neoplasms, diagnosis; Lung neoplasms, screening; Lung neoplasms, staging

Indexed keywords

CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; LUNG CANCER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY;

EID: 0035184822     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2213010617     Document Type: Short Survey

References (8)

1. CT screening for lung cancer: Not ready for routine practice
2. Screening for lung cancer: Can it be cost-effective?
3. CT screening for lung cancer: Coping with nihilistic recommendations
4. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: Overall design and findings from baseline screening
5. The effect of surgical treatment on survival from early lung cancer: Implications for screening
6. Survival for clinical stage I lung cancer not surgically treated: Comparison between screen-detected and symptom-detected cases
7. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: Initial findings from annual repeat screening