Simple pooling versus combining in meta-analysis

Evaluation and the Health Professions

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 218-230

  Bravata, Dena M ^a   Olkin, Ingram ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW;

DATA COLLECTION; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS;

EID: 0035182332     PISSN: 01632787     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/01632780122034885     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Study shows wider utility for aspirin
2. On Simpson's paradox and the sure-thing principle
3. On avoiding association paradoxes in contingency tables
4. Collapsibility of relative risk in contingency tables with a response variable
5. Strong collapsibility of association measures in linear models
6. The amalgamation and geometry of two-by-two contingency tables
7. Can data recognize its parent distribution?
8. Homogeneity of subpopulations and Simpson's paradox
9. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution - VI. Genetic (reproductive) selection: Inheritance of fertility in man, and of fecundity in thoroughbred racehorses
10. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and design
11. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. Analysis and examples
12. The ecological fallacy
13. Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals
14. Simpson's paradox and related phenomena
15. The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables
16. Notes on the theory of association of attributes in statistics