The accuracy of footprint contact area measurements: Relevance to the design and performance of pressure platforms

Foot

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 151-157

  Urry, S R ^a   Wearing, S C ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INK;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DERMATOGLYPHICS; ELECTRONICS; HALLUX; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING; MEASUREMENT; METHODOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSOR; SOLE DERMATOGLYPHICS; TOE;

EID: 0035165196     PISSN: 09582592     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/foot.2001.0684     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Plantar pressure distribution in normal, hallux valgus and hallux limitus feet
2. The arch index: A useful measure from footprints
3. Pressure distribution under symptom-free feet during barefoot standing
4. The use of the arch index to characterize arch height: A digital image processing approach
5. Frequency content of normal and diabetic plantar pressure profiles: Implications for the selection of transducer sizes
6. Footprint analysis between three and seventeen years of age
7. Footprint parameters as a measure of arch height
8. Pressure distribution patterns under the feet of children in comparison with adults
9. The importance of the toes in walking
10. Spatial resolution in plantar pressure measurement
11. The function of the toes in walking, jogging and running
12. Comparison of footprint parameters calculated from static and dynamic footprints
13. Arch index as a predictor of arch height
14. Use of medial longitudinal arch height to predict plantar surface contact area during walking
15. Effects of walking speed on plantar pressure patterns and hindfoot angular motion
16. Evaluating different footprint parameters as a predictor of arch height
17. Plantar pressure-measurement sensors
18. A comparison of footprint indices calculated from ink and electronic footprints
19. Footprint analysis during the growth period
20. The Harris and Beath footprint: Interpretation and clinical value