Patient follow up screening evaluations. Examples with regard to congenital hip dislocation and congenital heart disease

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 126-131

  Juttmann, R E ^a   Hess, J ^b   Van Oortmarssen, G J ^a   Van der Maas, P J ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b SOPHIA CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHILD; CHILD HEALTH CARE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE; CONGENITAL HIP DISLOCATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MASS SCREENING; NETHERLANDS; OBSERVATION; ONSET AGE; PATIENT SELECTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TIME;

CHILD; CHILD WELFARE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH SERVICES MISUSE; HEART DEFECTS, CONGENITAL; HIP DISLOCATION, CONGENITAL; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; NETHERLANDS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SELECTION BIAS;

EID: 0035152921     PISSN: 0143005X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jech.55.2.126     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Screening: The rules of the game
2. European randomized study for screening prostate cancer, the Rotterdam pilot studies
3. Infants with congenital heart disease in the first year of life
4. Screening for congenital heart malformation in child health centres
5. Neonatal screening and staggered early treatment for congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip
6. Evaluating the national screening programme for congenital dislocation of the hip
7. Early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip in The Netherlands: The validity of a standardized assessment protocol in infants
8. Unnecessarily taxing treatment of congenital hip dislocation to be avoided by timely diagnosis at the well-child center
9. Case-control study of screening