Blinded prospective study of the incidence of deep venous thrombosis following conventional or laparoscopic colorectal resection

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 99-100

  Mall, J W ^a   Schwenk, W ^a   Rodiger O ^a   Zippel, K ^a   Pollmann, C ^a   Muller J M ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON RESECTION; COLORECTAL SURGERY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECTUM RESECTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE;

COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; VENOUS THROMBOSIS;

EID: 0035152017     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01635.x     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
2. Clinical assessment of venous thromboembolic risk in surgical patients
3. Evolution of deep venous thrombosis: A prospective evaluation with US
4. If nothing goes wrong, is everything alright? Interpreting zero numerators
5. Incidence of deep vein thrombosis after laparoscopic vs minilaparotomy cholecystectomy