Comparison between micropropagated banana (Musa AAA; 'Williams') and conventional planting material during the first 12 months of development

Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 83-87

  Smith, M K ^a   Searle, C ^a   Langdon, P W ^a   Schaffer, B ^a   Whiley, A W ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND FISHERIES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; GLASSHOUSE; MICROPROPAGATION; PLANT ANATOMY AND MORPHOLOGY; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT LEAF; PLANT SUCKER; ROOT GROWTH;

MUSA;

EID: 0035147150     PISSN: 14620316     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2001.11511331     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Getting the best out of tissue culture
2. Field evaluation of tissue-cultured bananas in south-eastern Queensland
3. Physiological responses of banana (Musa AAA; Cavendish sub-group) in the sub-tropics. IV. Comparison between tissue culture and conventional planting material during the first months of development
4. The influence of the mother plant on sucker growth, development and photosynthesis in banana (Musa AAA; Dwarf Cavendish)
5. Juvenility in micropropagated strawberries (Fragaria ananassa Duch)
6. In vitro culture of bananas
7. Field evaluation of five clones of tissue cultured bananas in northern New South Wales
8. Comparative morphology, phenology and production potential of banana cultivars 'Dwarf Cavendish' and 'Williams' in the Eastern Transvaal Lowveld
9. Early detection of dwarf off-types from micropropagated Cavendish bananas
10. Banana plant growth. I. Gross morphology