|
Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 27-37
|
A comparison of scoring weights for the Euroqol© derived from patients and the general public
|
Author keywords
Clinical trials; EuroQol; Preference assessment
|
Indexed keywords
DRUG VEHICLE;
NEW DRUG;
TIRILAZAD;
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL PROTOCOL;
CLINICAL STUDY;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
COST UTILITY ANALYSIS;
DATA ANALYSIS;
DISEASE CLASSIFICATION;
DISEASE SEVERITY;
EVALUATION;
FEMALE;
HEALTH STATUS;
HEALTH SURVEY;
HUMAN;
INFORMATION PROCESSING;
INSTRUMENT;
LINEAR SYSTEM;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
MEASUREMENT;
MEDICAL RESEARCH;
PATIENT ATTITUDE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PUBLIC HEALTH;
PUBLIC OPINION;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
RATING SCALE;
REGRESSION ANALYSIS;
SAMPLING;
SCORING SYSTEM;
SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE;
ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING;
ATTITUDE TO HEALTH;
CLINICAL TRIALS;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE RATIONING;
HEALTH STATUS;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS;
MIDDLE AGED;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);
QUALITY OF LIFE;
QUESTIONNAIRES;
REGRESSION ANALYSIS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE;
|
EID: 0035145413
PISSN: 10579230
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1002/1099-1050(200101)10:1<27::AID-HEC561>3.0.CO;2-R Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (46)
|
References (31)
|