Modulated polarization microscopy: A promising new approach to visualizing cytoskeletal dynamics in living cells

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 972-985

  Kuhn, Jeffrey R ^a   Wu, Zhuoru ^a   Poenie, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL KINETICS; CELL ULTRASTRUCTURE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CYTOSKELETON; DEVICE; FILTER; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; POLARIZATION; POLARIZATION MICROSCOPY;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0035144543     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76076-6     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Allen, R. D. 1967. Optical differentiation of amoebic ectoplasm and endoplasmic flow. Science. 158:142-143.
2. Allen, R. D., and N. S. Allen. 1983. Video-enhanced microscopy with a computer frame memory. J. Microsc. 129:3-17.
3. Allen, R. D., J. Brault, and R. Moore. 1963. A New Method of Polarization Microscopic Analysis. J. Cell Biol 18:223-235.
4. Allen, R. D., J. W. Brault, and R. M. Zeh. 1966. Image contrast and phase-modulated light methods in polarization and interference microscopy. Adv. Opt. Electron Microsc. 1:77-114.
5. Allen, R. D., and H. Nakajima. 1965. Two-exposure, film densitometric method measuring phase retardations due to weak birefringence in fibrillar or membranous cell constituents. Exp. Cell Res. 37:230-249.
6. Allen, R. D., and L. I. Rebhun. 1962. Photoelectric measurement of small fluctuating retardations in weakly birefringent, light-scattering biological objects. Exp. Cell Res. 29:583-592.
7. Azzam, R. M. A. 1978. Simulation of mechanical rotation by optical rotation: application to the design of a new Fourier photopolarimeter. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 68:518-521.
8. Baker, W. R., and J. A. Johnston. 1967. Optical differentiation of amoebic ectoplasm and endoplasmic flow. Science. 156:825-826.