Manifest refraction versus autorefraction for patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 447-452

  Orr, P R ^a   Cramer, L D ^a   Hawkins, B S ^a   Bressler, N M ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE REFRACTION; HUMAN; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REFRACTION ERROR; SUBRETINAL NEOVASCULARIZATION; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION; FEMALE; FOVEA CENTRALIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; REFRACTION, OCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0035140896     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Procedures of refraction and vision testing
2. Visual acuity protocol
3. An evaluation of automated infra-red optometers
4. The validity and reliability of autorefractor: An evaluation
5. The Beaver Dam Eye Study: Visual acuity
6. New visual acuity charts for clinical research
7. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement
8. Some common problems in medical research
9. Reproducibility of refraction and visual acuity measurement under a standard protocol
10. The repeatability of measurement of the ocular components
11. Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in an adult inner city population
12. Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction
13. Reliability of refraction: A literature review