Stereochemical studies on sphinxolide: Advances in the J-based NMR determination of the relative configuration of flexible systems

European Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn , Issue 1, 2001, Pages 39-44

  Bassarello, Carla ^a   Bifulco, Giuseppe ^a   Zampella, Angela ^b   D'Auria, Maria Valeria ^b   Riccio, Raffaele ^a   Gomez Paloma, Luigi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALERNO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Antitumor agents; Natural products; NMR spectroscopy; Sphinxolide; Structure elucidation

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; NATURAL PRODUCT; SPHINXOLIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANTINEOPLASTIC ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; DEGRADATION; DRUG CONFORMATION; DRUG DETERMINATION; DRUG STRUCTURE; ITALY; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; STEREOCHEMISTRY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 0035138318     PISSN: 1434193X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1099-0690(200101)2001:1<39::AID-EJOC39>3.0.CO;2-9     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. N. Matsumori, D. Kaneno, M. Murata, H. Nakamura, K. Tachibana, J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 866-876.
2. M. Kurz, P. Schmieder, H. Kessler, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 1329-1331.
3. J. Boyd, N. Soffe, B. John, D. Plant, R. Hurd, J. Magn. Reson. 1992, 98, 660-664.
4. A. L. Davis, J. Keeler, E. D. Laue, D. Moskau, J. Magn. Reson. 1992, 98, 207-216.
5. P. L. Rinaldi, P. Keifer, J. Magn. Reson., 1994, Ser. A 108, 259-262.
6. K. E. Kövér, V. J. Hruby, D. Uhrin, J. Magn. Reson. 1997, 129, 125-129.
7. D. Uhrín, G. Batta, V. J. Hruby, P. N. Barlow, K. E. Kövér, J. Magn. Reson. 1998, 130, 155-161.
8. G. Guella, I. Mancini, G. Chiasera, F. Pietra, Helv. Chim. Acta 1989, 72, 237-246.
9. M. V. D'Auria, L. Gomez-Paloma, L. Minale, A. Zampella, J. F. Verbist, C. Roussakis, C. Debitus, Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 8657-8645.
10. X. Zhang, L. Minale, A. Zampella, C. D. Smith, Cancer Research 1997, 57, 3751-3758.
11. M. V. D'Auria, L. Gomez-Paloma, L. Minale, A. Zampella, J. F. Verbist, C. Roussakis, C. Debitus, J. Patissou, Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 4829-4834.
12. Carbonelli, A. Zampella, A. Randazzo, C. Debitus, L. Gomez-Paloma, Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 14665-14674.
13. L. Mueller, J. Magn. Reson. 1987, 72, 191-196.
14. Y. Kim, J. H. Prestegard, J. Magn. Reson. 1989, 84, 9-13.
15. A. Bax, D. G. Davis, J. Magn. Reson. 1985, 63, 207-13.
16. Actually, the side chain fragment C24-C33 contains two subunits separated by the C31 carbonyl functionality. Although the J-based method did not provide any stereochemical interconnection between the above subunits, a comparison with several other related marine macrolides would strongly favor the relative configuration depicted in 1.
17. Reidispongiolide A was chosen among all derivatives of the sphinxolide family because it was recently reisolated in large amounts from a recollection of the sponge Reidispongia coerulea.
18. H. C. Brown, K. S. Bhat, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 5919-5923.
19. S. Saito, T. Ishikawa, A. Kuruda, K. Koga, T. Moriwake, Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 4067-4086.
20. M. Ishibashi, R. E. Moore, G. M. L. Patterson, C. Xu, J. Clardy, J. Org: Chem. 1986, 51, 5300-5306.
21. K. Yamada, M. Ojika, T. Ishisaki, Y. Yoshida, H. Ekimoto, M. Arakawa, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 11020-11021.
22. R. D. Norcross, I. Paterson, Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2041-2114.