Fetal biometry: A comparison of family physicians and radiologists

Family Medicine

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 111-114

  Keith, Rex ^a,b   Frisch, Larry ^b  

^a Via Christi Family Practice Residency Program ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE WICHITA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FETUS; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; PRENATAL CARE; RADIOLOGIST; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; RESIDENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

BIOMETRY; EMBRYONIC AND FETAL DEVELOPMENT; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; PREGNANCY; RADIOLOGY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 0035135801     PISSN: 07423225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Obstetric sonography. Who to scan, when to scan, and by whom
2. Family practice obstetric ultrasound in an urban community health center. Birth outcomes and examination accuracy of the initial 227 cases
3. Obstetric ultrasound by family physicians. Adequacy as assessed by pregnancy outcome
4. Dystrophic calcification of the fetal myocardium
5. Reliability of fetal anthropometry by ultrasound
6. Ultrasound anthropometric reliability
7. Inter-observer variability. A source of error in obstetric ultrasound
8. A comparison of three methods of assessing inter-observer variation applied to ultrasonic fetal measurements in the third trimester
9. Accurate detection of anomalies by routine ultrasonography in an indigent clinic population