|
Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 249-254
|
Comments on 'Underestimation of the small residual damage when measuring DNA double-strand breaks (DSB): Is the repair of radiation-induced DSB complete?'[1] (multiple letter)
a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
DNA FRAGMENT;
DOUBLE STRANDED DNA;
ANALYTIC METHOD;
DNA DETERMINATION;
DNA REPAIR;
DNA STRAND BREAKAGE;
DOSE RESPONSE;
LETTER;
MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS;
MATHEMATICAL MODEL;
METHODOLOGY;
PREMATURE CHROMOSOME CONDENSATION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RADIATION DOSE;
RADIATION EXPOSURE;
ANIMALS;
CRICETINAE;
DNA DAMAGE;
DNA FRAGMENTATION;
DNA REPAIR;
DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION;
HUMANS;
KINETICS;
MODELS, STATISTICAL;
TIME FACTORS;
|
EID: 0035134942
PISSN: 09553002
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1080/09553000010008522 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (0)
|