|
|
Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 3-4
|
|
Imposed separation of conjoined twins-moral hubris by the english courts?
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
AUTHORITY;
CONFLICT;
CONJOINED TWINS;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
COURT;
EDITORIAL;
HUMAN;
HUMAN RIGHTS;
INFANT;
INFANT WELFARE;
INFORMED CONSENT;
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;
MORALITY;
PARENT;
RELIGION;
RESPONSIBILITY;
SURVIVAL;
UNITED KINGDOM;
DISSENT;
JUDICIAL ACTION;
KILLING;
LEGAL APPROACH;
MORAL POLICY;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
DISSENT AND DISPUTES;
ETHICS, MEDICAL;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HUMANS;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
MORALS;
PROGNOSIS;
THIRD-PARTY CONSENT;
TWINS, CONJOINED;
|
|
EID: 0035134859
PISSN: 03066800
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1136/jme.27.1.3 Document Type: Editorial |
|
Times cited : (21)
|
|
References (3)
|
