Two-dimensional anisotropic non-Fermi-liquid phase of coupled Luttinger liquids

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 86, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 676-679

  Vishwanath, Ashvin ^a   Carpentier, David ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; CARRIER CONCENTRATION; ELECTRON SCATTERING; FERMIONS; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; QUANTUM THEORY;

BOSONIZATION; CHARGE DENSITY WAVE; SLIDING LUTTINGER LIQUID; TRANSVERSE SINGLE PARTICLE HOPPING PERTURBATION; TWO DIMENSIONAL ANISOTROPIC NON FERMI LIQUID PHASE;

FERMI LIQUIDS;

EID: 0035130967     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.676     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. S. Tomonaga. Prog. Theor. Phys. 5, 544 (1950); J.M. Luttinger, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 4, 1154 (1963); F. D.M. Haldane, J. Phys. C 14, 2585 (1981).
2. S. Tomonaga. Prog. Theor. Phys. 5, 544 (1950); J.M. Luttinger, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 4, 1154 (1963); F. D.M. Haldane, J. Phys. C 14, 2585 (1981).
3. S. Tomonaga. Prog. Theor. Phys. 5, 544 (1950); J.M. Luttinger, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 4, 1154 (1963); F. D.M. Haldane, J. Phys. C 14, 2585 (1981).
4. V. M. Yakovenko, JETP Lett. 56, 510 (1992).
5. S. Strong, D. G. Clarke, and P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1007 (1994).
6. See the recent review by F. von Oppen et al., condmat/0002087.
7. J. Tranquada et al., Nature (London) 375, 561 (1995); S. A. Kivelson et al., Nature (London) 393, 550 (1998).
8. J. Tranquada et al., Nature (London) 375, 561 (1995); S. A. Kivelson et al., Nature (London) 393, 550 (1998).
9. A. Vishwanath and D. Carpentier (to be published).
10. A. Vishwanath and T. Senthil, Phys. Rev. B 63, 014506 (2001).
11. Although the electrons in quantum Hall effect stripes are spin polarized, the physics in that case differs in many details from what we consider here, due to the presence of the soft translational mode and the magnetic field.
12. C. S. O'Hern, T. C. Lubensky, and J. Toner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2745 (1999).
13. H. J. Schulz, J. Phys. C 16, 6769 (1983).
14. ij(0) + ⋯, which leads to terms containing additional spatial derivatives, which are irrelevant at the SLL fixed points.
15. i can slide relative to each other at no cost.
16. The case of double roots is considered in [6].
17. Choosing the set of perturbing operators for a physical situation is an involved issue, which will depend on details of the system and the small but, nevertheless, finite temperature at which it is considered. Then, operators that have small bare values and are not further generated in the RG could be unimportant, even if relevant.
18. δl where α = ±1 for (L/R) and α + β = γ + δ by momentum conservation. We have taken the maximum separation between any two fermion operators to be ≤10. The ones that destabilize the SLL points usually involve simultaneous hops on pairs of nearest neighbor chains. These could well be present or generated in physical systems.
19. V. J. Emery, E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson, and T. C. Lubensky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2160 (2000).