Comparison of cuffed tunneled hemodialysis catheter survival

American Journal of Kidney Diseases

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 557-563

  Rocklin, Michael A ^a   Dwight, Cindy A ^a   Callen, Lori J ^a   Bispham, Birgit Z ^a   Spiegel, David M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Catheter infection; Central venous catheters; Hemodialysis (HD) access

Indexed keywords

ARTERIOVENOUS SHUNT; ARTICLE; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY DISEASE; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; SAFETY; TREATMENT FAILURE; VASCULAR ACCESS;

EID: 0035127251     PISSN: 02726386     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.22082     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. The hemodialysis catheter conundrum: Hate living with them, but can't live without them
2. Excerpts from USRDS 1997 Annual Data Report
3. Randomized comparison of high-flow versus conventional hemodialysis catheters
4. Comparison of blood flow rates and hydraulic resistance between the Mahurkar catheter, the Tesio Twin Catheter, and the Ash Split Cath
5. Outcome of tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed by radiologists
6. Outcome of tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed via the right internal jugular vein by interventional radiologists
7. Catheter-related bacteremia and outcome of attempted catheter salvage in patients undergoing hemodialysis
8. Bacteremia associated with tunneled, cuffed hemodialysis catheters