Thomas-Fermi-Dirac-von Weizsacker models in finite systems

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 114, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 631-638

  Chan, Garnet Kin Lic ^a   Cohen, Aron J ^a   Handy, Nicholas C ^a  

^a Department of Chemistry ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING ENERGY; CHEMICAL BONDS; FERMI LEVEL; INTEGRODIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; KINETIC ENERGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUCLEAR ENERGY; NUMERICAL METHODS;

THOMAS-FERMI-DIRAC-VON WEIZSACKER MODELS;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

EID: 0035124690     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1321308     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. L. H. Thomas, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 23, 542 (1927).
2. E. Fermi, Z. Phys. 48, 73 (1928).
3. P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. B 136, 864 (1964).
4. W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. A 140, 1133 (1965).
5. Y. Tomishima and K. Yonei, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 21, 142 (1966).
6. K. Yonei, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 31, 882 (1971).
7. E. H. Lieb and B. Simon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 681 (1973).
8. W. Yang, Phys. Rev. A 34, 4575 (1986).
9. A. Berk, Phys. Rev. A 28, 1908 (1983).
10. T. A. Wesolowski, Y. Ellinger, and J. Weber, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 6078 (1998).
11. E. K. U. Gross and R. M. Dreizler, Phys. Rev. A 20, 1798 (1979).
12. L. W. Wang and M. P. Teter, Phys. Rev. B 45, 13 196 (1992).
13. M. Foley and P. A. Madden, Phys. Rev. B 53, 10 589 (1996).
14. G. K-L. Chan and N. C. Handy, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 5639 (2000).
15. E. Teller, Rev. Mod. Phys. 34, 627 (1962).
16. N. L. Balazs, Phys. Rev. 156, 42 (1967).
17. R. G. Parr and W. Yang, Density Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989).
18. More specifically, Balazs has argued that binding is not possible if the density is a function of the total classical electrostatic potential.
19. C. F. von Weizsäcker, Z. Phys. 96, 431 (1935).
20. P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 26, 376 (1930).
21. E. H. Lieb, Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 603 (1981).
22. W.-P. Wang and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. A 16, 891 (1977).
23. G. K-L. Chan and N. C. Handy, J. Chem. Phys. 59, 2670 (1999).
24. W. Stich, E. K. U. Gross, P. Malzacher, and R. M. Dreizler, Z. Phys. A 309, 5 (1982).
25. A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 2547 (1988).
26. C. W. Murray, N. C. Handy, and G. J. Laming, Mol. Phys. 78, 997 (1993).
27. V. I. Lebedev, Sibirsk, Mat. Zh 18, 132 (1975); Russ. Acad. Sci. Dokl. Math. 45, 593 (1992).
28. V. I. Lebedev, Sibirsk, Mat. Zh 18, 132 (1975); Russ. Acad. Sci. Dokl. Math. 45, 593 (1992).
29. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in Fortran, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992).
30. E. Clementi and E. Roetti, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 14, 177 (1974).
31. T. H. Dunning, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 55, 716 (1971). These basis sets are contracted 5s4p quality for the first-row atoms, and contracted 3s quality for H. In the TZ2P calculations, we have added polarization functions (p type for H, d type for other first-row atoms), with exponents 0.4. 0.1 for H, 1.2, 0.4 for C, 1.35, 0.45 for N, 1.35, 0.45 for O, 2.0, 0.67 for F.
32. CADPAC: Cambridge Analytical Derivatives Package Issue 6.5, Cambridge, UK, 1998: A suite of quantum chemistry programs developed by R. D. Amos with contributions from I. L. Alberts, J. S. Andrews, S. M. Colwell, N. C. Handy, D. Jayatilaka, P. J. Knowles, R. Kobayashi, N. Koga, K. E. Laidig, P. E. Maslen, C. W. Murray, J. E. Rice, J. Sanz, E. D. Simandiras, A. J. Stone, M.-D. Su, and D. J. Tozer.
33. H. Lee, C. T. Lee, and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. A 44, 768 (1991).
34. C. H. Hodges, Can. J. Phys. 51, 1428 (1973).